From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Consolidate clks_register() and similar
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:57:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100112185757.GG5633@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BD79186B4FD85F4B8E60E381CAEE190902089AAB@mi8nycmail19.Mi8.com>
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:43:54PM -0500, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> You must have merged you patch first. The removal of line 448:
No - the ep93xx was merged as a whole with the miscellaneous branch,
resulting in no conflicts. Git is occasionally good with merging.
> - int i;
>
> Probably produced a one line fuzz for both patches. Is everything ok still
> for those two patches?
$ diff -u <(pdb getpatch 5879/1) <(git diff-tree -u 346e34abb2c56695ee4bd6af924141c97a0babfb )
--- /proc/self/fd/63 2010-01-12 18:53:48.958011270 +0000
+++ /proc/self/fd/62 2010-01-12 18:53:48.981135820 +0000
@@ -1,13 +1,9 @@
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
- arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/ep93xx-regs.h | 7 +++++--
- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+346e34abb2c56695ee4bd6af924141c97a0babfb
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c
-index 1d0f9d8..f77c410 100644
+index 07a58d0..27e3351 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c
-@@ -447,25 +447,29 @@ static int __init ep93xx_clock_init(void)
+@@ -449,25 +449,29 @@ static int __init ep93xx_clock_init(void)
u32 value;
int i;
@@ -44,7 +40,7 @@
+ /* Initialize the pll2 derived clocks */
clk_usb_host.rate = clk_pll2.rate / (((value >> 28) & 0xf) + 1);
- printk(KERN_INFO "ep93xx: PLL1 running at %ld MHz, PLL2 at %ld MHz\n",
+ pr_info("PLL1 running at %ld MHz, PLL2 at %ld MHz\n",
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/ep93xx-regs.h b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/ep93xx-regs.h
index d55194a..cd35912 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/ep93xx-regs.h
So the only difference in the patch is the pr_info line.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-12 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-10 17:28 [PATCH] Consolidate clks_register() and similar Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-10 22:23 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-10 23:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-11 1:04 ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-11 17:26 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2010-01-11 17:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-11 22:06 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-01-12 12:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-12 17:29 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2010-01-12 17:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-12 17:43 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2010-01-12 18:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-01-12 19:16 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-01-12 0:11 ` Eric Miao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100112185757.GG5633@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).