linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization
@ 2009-09-17  0:32 H Hartley Sweeten
  2009-09-18  8:55 ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2009-09-17  0:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

This reorganizes the vic.c code in anticipation of a future patch
to use struct vic_device as the data stored in set_irq_chip_data().

The new code has the following flow:

1) struct vic_device definition, static variables, and to_vic()
   moved to the start of the code.
2) vic power management callbacks
3) vic power management initialization/registration
4) irq_chip callbacks
5) vendor specific vic initialization
6) vic initialization

In addition the typo vik_init_st is fixed (vic_init_st).

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Cc: Alessandro Rubini <rubini-list@gnudd.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com>

---

I originally sent this to the wrong list...

V2 - rebased to current git tree


diff --git a/arch/arm/common/vic.c b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
index 920ced0..f9e0016 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/vic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
@@ -27,48 +27,6 @@
 #include <asm/mach/irq.h>
 #include <asm/hardware/vic.h>
 
-static void vic_ack_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
-	irq &= 31;
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
-	/* moreover, clear the soft-triggered, in case it was the reason */
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
-}
-
-static void vic_mask_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
-	irq &= 31;
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
-}
-
-static void vic_unmask_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
-	irq &= 31;
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
-}
-
-/**
- * vic_init2 - common initialisation code
- * @base: Base of the VIC.
- *
- * Common initialisation code for registeration
- * and resume.
-*/
-static void vic_init2(void __iomem *base)
-{
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-		void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
-		writel(VIC_VECT_CNTL_ENABLE | i, reg);
-	}
-
-	writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
-}
-
 #if defined(CONFIG_PM)
 /**
  * struct vic_device - VIC PM device
@@ -98,13 +56,34 @@ struct vic_device {
 /* we cannot allocate memory when VICs are initially registered */
 static struct vic_device vic_devices[CONFIG_ARM_VIC_NR];
 
+static int vic_id;
+
 static inline struct vic_device *to_vic(struct sys_device *sys)
 {
 	return container_of(sys, struct vic_device, sysdev);
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
 
-static int vic_id;
+/**
+ * vic_init2 - common initialisation code
+ * @base: Base of the VIC.
+ *
+ * Common initialisation code for registeration
+ * and resume.
+*/
+static void vic_init2(void __iomem *base)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
+		void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
+		writel(VIC_VECT_CNTL_ENABLE | i, reg);
+	}
 
+	writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
+}
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_PM)
 static int vic_class_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
 {
 	struct vic_device *vic = to_vic(dev);
@@ -158,31 +137,6 @@ struct sysdev_class vic_class = {
 };
 
 /**
- * vic_pm_register - Register a VIC for later power management control
- * @base: The base address of the VIC.
- * @irq: The base IRQ for the VIC.
- * @resume_sources: bitmask of interrupts allowed for resume sources.
- *
- * Register the VIC with the system device tree so that it can be notified
- * of suspend and resume requests and ensure that the correct actions are
- * taken to re-instate the settings on resume.
- */
-static void __init vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 resume_sources)
-{
-	struct vic_device *v;
-
-	if (vic_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(vic_devices))
-		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: too few VICs, increase CONFIG_ARM_VIC_NR\n", __func__);
-	else {
-		v = &vic_devices[vic_id];
-		v->base = base;
-		v->resume_sources = resume_sources;
-		v->irq = irq;
-		vic_id++;
-	}
-}
-
-/**
  * vic_pm_init - initicall to register VIC pm
  *
  * This is called via late_initcall() to register
@@ -218,9 +172,60 @@ static int __init vic_pm_init(void)
 
 	return 0;
 }
-
 late_initcall(vic_pm_init);
 
+/**
+ * vic_pm_register - Register a VIC for later power management control
+ * @base: The base address of the VIC.
+ * @irq: The base IRQ for the VIC.
+ * @resume_sources: bitmask of interrupts allowed for resume sources.
+ *
+ * Register the VIC with the system device tree so that it can be notified
+ * of suspend and resume requests and ensure that the correct actions are
+ * taken to re-instate the settings on resume.
+ */
+static void __init vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 resume_sources)
+{
+	struct vic_device *v;
+
+	if (vic_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(vic_devices))
+		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: too few VICs, increase CONFIG_ARM_VIC_NR\n", __func__);
+	else {
+		v = &vic_devices[vic_id];
+		v->base = base;
+		v->resume_sources = resume_sources;
+		v->irq = irq;
+		vic_id++;
+	}
+}
+#else
+static inline void vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 arg1) { }
+#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
+
+static void vic_ack_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+	irq &= 31;
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+	/* moreover, clear the soft-triggered, in case it was the reason */
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
+}
+
+static void vic_mask_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+	irq &= 31;
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+}
+
+static void vic_unmask_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+	irq &= 31;
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
+}
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_PM)
 static struct vic_device *vic_from_irq(unsigned int irq)
 {
         struct vic_device *v = vic_devices;
@@ -254,10 +259,7 @@ static int vic_set_wake(unsigned int irq, unsigned int on)
 
 	return 0;
 }
-
 #else
-static inline void vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 arg1) { }
-
 #define vic_set_wake NULL
 #endif /* CONFIG_PM */
 
@@ -269,9 +271,62 @@ static struct irq_chip vic_chip = {
 	.set_wake = vic_set_wake,
 };
 
-/* The PL190 cell from ARM has been modified by ST, so handle both here */
-static void vik_init_st(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
-			 u32 vic_sources);
+/*
+ * The PL190 cell from ARM has been modified by ST to handle 64 interrupts.
+ * The original cell has 32 interrupts, while the modified one has 64,
+ * replocating two blocks 0x00..0x1f in 0x20..0x3f. In that case
+ * the probe function is called twice, with base set to offset 000
+ *  and 020 within the page. We call this "second block".
+ */
+static void __init vic_init_st(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
+				u32 vic_sources)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+	int vic_2nd_block = ((unsigned long)base & ~PAGE_MASK) != 0;
+
+	/* Disable all interrupts initially. */
+
+	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_SELECT);
+	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
+	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+	writel(0, base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS);
+	writel(0, base + VIC_ITCR);
+	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
+
+	/*
+	 * Make sure we clear all existing interrupts. The vector registers
+	 * in this cell are after the second block of general registers,
+	 * so we can address them using standard offsets, but only from
+	 * the second base address, which is 0x20 in the page
+	 */
+	if (vic_2nd_block) {
+		writel(0, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
+		for (i = 0; i < 19; i++) {
+			unsigned int value;
+
+			value = readl(base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
+			writel(value, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
+		}
+		/* ST has 16 vectors as well, but we don't enable them by now */
+		for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
+			void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
+			writel(0, reg);
+		}
+
+		writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
+		if (vic_sources & (1 << i)) {
+			unsigned int irq = irq_start + i;
+
+			set_irq_chip(irq, &vic_chip);
+			set_irq_chip_data(irq, base);
+			set_irq_handler(irq, handle_level_irq);
+			set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
+		}
+	}
+}
 
 /**
  * vic_init - initialise a vectored interrupt controller
@@ -298,7 +353,7 @@ void __init vic_init(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
 
 	switch(vendor) {
 	case AMBA_VENDOR_ST:
-		vik_init_st(base, irq_start, vic_sources);
+		vic_init_st(base, irq_start, vic_sources);
 		return;
 	default:
 		printk(KERN_WARNING "VIC: unknown vendor, continuing anyways\n");
@@ -342,60 +397,3 @@ void __init vic_init(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
 
 	vic_pm_register(base, irq_start, resume_sources);
 }
-
-/*
- * The PL190 cell from ARM has been modified by ST to handle 64 interrupts.
- * The original cell has 32 interrupts, while the modified one has 64,
- * replocating two blocks 0x00..0x1f in 0x20..0x3f. In that case
- * the probe function is called twice, with base set to offset 000
- *  and 020 within the page. We call this "second block".
- */
-static void __init vik_init_st(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
-				u32 vic_sources)
-{
-	unsigned int i;
-	int vic_2nd_block = ((unsigned long)base & ~PAGE_MASK) != 0;
-
-	/* Disable all interrupts initially. */
-
-	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_SELECT);
-	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
-	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
-	writel(0, base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS);
-	writel(0, base + VIC_ITCR);
-	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
-
-	/*
-	 * Make sure we clear all existing interrupts. The vector registers
-	 * in this cell are after the second block of general registers,
-	 * so we can address them using standard offsets, but only from
-	 * the second base address, which is 0x20 in the page
-	 */
-	if (vic_2nd_block) {
-		writel(0, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
-		for (i = 0; i < 19; i++) {
-			unsigned int value;
-
-			value = readl(base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
-			writel(value, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
-		}
-		/* ST has 16 vectors as well, but we don't enable them by now */
-		for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-			void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
-			writel(0, reg);
-		}
-
-		writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
-	}
-
-	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
-		if (vic_sources & (1 << i)) {
-			unsigned int irq = irq_start + i;
-
-			set_irq_chip(irq, &vic_chip);
-			set_irq_chip_data(irq, base);
-			set_irq_handler(irq, handle_level_irq);
-			set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
-		}
-	}
-} 

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization
  2009-09-17  0:32 [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization H Hartley Sweeten
@ 2009-09-18  8:55 ` Linus Walleij
  2009-09-18 16:23   ` H Hartley Sweeten
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2009-09-18  8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

2009/9/17 H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>:

> This reorganizes the vic.c code in anticipation of a future patch
> to use struct vic_device as the data stored in set_irq_chip_data().

This doesn't apply cleanly to -next anymore, can you send an
updated version and I'll test it?

Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization
  2009-09-18  8:55 ` Linus Walleij
@ 2009-09-18 16:23   ` H Hartley Sweeten
  2009-09-18 16:31     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2009-09-18 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Friday, September 18, 2009 1:56 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2009/9/17 H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>:
>
>> This reorganizes the vic.c code in anticipation of a future patch
>> to use struct vic_device as the data stored in set_irq_chip_data().
>
> This doesn't apply cleanly to -next anymore, can you send an
> updated version and I'll test it?

Hmm... Applies fine to -next here.

The only thing I can think of that might keep it from applying is if
your -next tree has the patch you posted to include device.h in the
driver.  That patch is of course needed so that the file will build
but I have not seen anything about someone picking it up yet.  That
patch will fuzz mine by one line.

I was hoping your patch would get merged soon to fix the build.  I
was then planning on rebasing this patch.  I just wanted to get this
out now for any comments.

Regards,
Hartley

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization
  2009-09-18 16:23   ` H Hartley Sweeten
@ 2009-09-18 16:31     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  2009-09-18 16:33       ` H Hartley Sweeten
  2009-09-25  1:56       ` H Hartley Sweeten
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2009-09-18 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:23:26PM -0400, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> The only thing I can think of that might keep it from applying is if
> your -next tree has the patch you posted to include device.h in the
> driver.  That patch is of course needed so that the file will build
> but I have not seen anything about someone picking it up yet.  That
> patch will fuzz mine by one line.
> 
> I was hoping your patch would get merged soon to fix the build.  I
> was then planning on rebasing this patch.  I just wanted to get this
> out now for any comments.

The patch adding device.h to vic.c is queued for this Saturday's push.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization
  2009-09-18 16:31     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2009-09-18 16:33       ` H Hartley Sweeten
  2009-09-25  1:56       ` H Hartley Sweeten
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2009-09-18 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Friday, September 18, 2009 9:31 AM, Russell King wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:23:26PM -0400, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> The only thing I can think of that might keep it from applying is if
>> your -next tree has the patch you posted to include device.h in the
>> driver.  That patch is of course needed so that the file will build
>> but I have not seen anything about someone picking it up yet.  That
>> patch will fuzz mine by one line.
>> 
>> I was hoping your patch would get merged soon to fix the build.  I
>> was then planning on rebasing this patch.  I just wanted to get this
>> out now for any comments.
>
> The patch adding device.h to vic.c is queued for this Saturday's push.

Thanks for the update Russell.  I will rebase this patch after that.

Regards,
Hartley

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization
  2009-09-18 16:31     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  2009-09-18 16:33       ` H Hartley Sweeten
@ 2009-09-25  1:56       ` H Hartley Sweeten
  2009-10-05 19:45         ` H Hartley Sweeten
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2009-09-25  1:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

This reorganizes the vic.c code in anticipation of a future patch
to use struct vic_device as the data stored in set_irq_chip_data().

The new code has the following flow:

1) struct vic_device definition, static variables, and to_vic()
   moved to the start of the code.
2) vic power management callbacks
3) vic power management initialization/registration
4) irq_chip callbacks
5) vendor specific vic initialization
6) vic initialization

In addition the typo vik_init_st is fixed (vic_init_st).

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Cc: Alessandro Rubini <rubini-list@gnudd.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com>

---

V3 - rebased to 2.6.31-gitcur

diff --git a/arch/arm/common/vic.c b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
index f232941..c04f6ac 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/vic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
@@ -28,48 +28,6 @@
 #include <asm/mach/irq.h>
 #include <asm/hardware/vic.h>
 
-static void vic_ack_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
-	irq &= 31;
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
-	/* moreover, clear the soft-triggered, in case it was the reason */
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
-}
-
-static void vic_mask_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
-	irq &= 31;
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
-}
-
-static void vic_unmask_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
-	irq &= 31;
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
-}
-
-/**
- * vic_init2 - common initialisation code
- * @base: Base of the VIC.
- *
- * Common initialisation code for registeration
- * and resume.
-*/
-static void vic_init2(void __iomem *base)
-{
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-		void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
-		writel(VIC_VECT_CNTL_ENABLE | i, reg);
-	}
-
-	writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
-}
-
 #if defined(CONFIG_PM)
 /**
  * struct vic_device - VIC PM device
@@ -99,13 +57,34 @@ struct vic_device {
 /* we cannot allocate memory when VICs are initially registered */
 static struct vic_device vic_devices[CONFIG_ARM_VIC_NR];
 
+static int vic_id;
+
 static inline struct vic_device *to_vic(struct sys_device *sys)
 {
 	return container_of(sys, struct vic_device, sysdev);
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
 
-static int vic_id;
+/**
+ * vic_init2 - common initialisation code
+ * @base: Base of the VIC.
+ *
+ * Common initialisation code for registeration
+ * and resume.
+*/
+static void vic_init2(void __iomem *base)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
+		void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
+		writel(VIC_VECT_CNTL_ENABLE | i, reg);
+	}
 
+	writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
+}
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_PM)
 static int vic_class_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
 {
 	struct vic_device *vic = to_vic(dev);
@@ -159,31 +138,6 @@ struct sysdev_class vic_class = {
 };
 
 /**
- * vic_pm_register - Register a VIC for later power management control
- * @base: The base address of the VIC.
- * @irq: The base IRQ for the VIC.
- * @resume_sources: bitmask of interrupts allowed for resume sources.
- *
- * Register the VIC with the system device tree so that it can be notified
- * of suspend and resume requests and ensure that the correct actions are
- * taken to re-instate the settings on resume.
- */
-static void __init vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 resume_sources)
-{
-	struct vic_device *v;
-
-	if (vic_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(vic_devices))
-		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: too few VICs, increase CONFIG_ARM_VIC_NR\n", __func__);
-	else {
-		v = &vic_devices[vic_id];
-		v->base = base;
-		v->resume_sources = resume_sources;
-		v->irq = irq;
-		vic_id++;
-	}
-}
-
-/**
  * vic_pm_init - initicall to register VIC pm
  *
  * This is called via late_initcall() to register
@@ -219,9 +173,60 @@ static int __init vic_pm_init(void)
 
 	return 0;
 }
-
 late_initcall(vic_pm_init);
 
+/**
+ * vic_pm_register - Register a VIC for later power management control
+ * @base: The base address of the VIC.
+ * @irq: The base IRQ for the VIC.
+ * @resume_sources: bitmask of interrupts allowed for resume sources.
+ *
+ * Register the VIC with the system device tree so that it can be notified
+ * of suspend and resume requests and ensure that the correct actions are
+ * taken to re-instate the settings on resume.
+ */
+static void __init vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 resume_sources)
+{
+	struct vic_device *v;
+
+	if (vic_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(vic_devices))
+		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: too few VICs, increase CONFIG_ARM_VIC_NR\n", __func__);
+	else {
+		v = &vic_devices[vic_id];
+		v->base = base;
+		v->resume_sources = resume_sources;
+		v->irq = irq;
+		vic_id++;
+	}
+}
+#else
+static inline void vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 arg1) { }
+#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
+
+static void vic_ack_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+	irq &= 31;
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+	/* moreover, clear the soft-triggered, in case it was the reason */
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
+}
+
+static void vic_mask_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+	irq &= 31;
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+}
+
+static void vic_unmask_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+	irq &= 31;
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
+}
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_PM)
 static struct vic_device *vic_from_irq(unsigned int irq)
 {
         struct vic_device *v = vic_devices;
@@ -255,10 +260,7 @@ static int vic_set_wake(unsigned int irq, unsigned int on)
 
 	return 0;
 }
-
 #else
-static inline void vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 arg1) { }
-
 #define vic_set_wake NULL
 #endif /* CONFIG_PM */
 
@@ -270,9 +272,62 @@ static struct irq_chip vic_chip = {
 	.set_wake = vic_set_wake,
 };
 
-/* The PL190 cell from ARM has been modified by ST, so handle both here */
-static void vik_init_st(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
-			 u32 vic_sources);
+/*
+ * The PL190 cell from ARM has been modified by ST to handle 64 interrupts.
+ * The original cell has 32 interrupts, while the modified one has 64,
+ * replocating two blocks 0x00..0x1f in 0x20..0x3f. In that case
+ * the probe function is called twice, with base set to offset 000
+ *  and 020 within the page. We call this "second block".
+ */
+static void __init vic_init_st(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
+				u32 vic_sources)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+	int vic_2nd_block = ((unsigned long)base & ~PAGE_MASK) != 0;
+
+	/* Disable all interrupts initially. */
+
+	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_SELECT);
+	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
+	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+	writel(0, base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS);
+	writel(0, base + VIC_ITCR);
+	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
+
+	/*
+	 * Make sure we clear all existing interrupts. The vector registers
+	 * in this cell are after the second block of general registers,
+	 * so we can address them using standard offsets, but only from
+	 * the second base address, which is 0x20 in the page
+	 */
+	if (vic_2nd_block) {
+		writel(0, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
+		for (i = 0; i < 19; i++) {
+			unsigned int value;
+
+			value = readl(base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
+			writel(value, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
+		}
+		/* ST has 16 vectors as well, but we don't enable them by now */
+		for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
+			void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
+			writel(0, reg);
+		}
+
+		writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
+		if (vic_sources & (1 << i)) {
+			unsigned int irq = irq_start + i;
+
+			set_irq_chip(irq, &vic_chip);
+			set_irq_chip_data(irq, base);
+			set_irq_handler(irq, handle_level_irq);
+			set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
+		}
+	}
+}
 
 /**
  * vic_init - initialise a vectored interrupt controller
@@ -299,7 +354,7 @@ void __init vic_init(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
 
 	switch(vendor) {
 	case AMBA_VENDOR_ST:
-		vik_init_st(base, irq_start, vic_sources);
+		vic_init_st(base, irq_start, vic_sources);
 		return;
 	default:
 		printk(KERN_WARNING "VIC: unknown vendor, continuing anyways\n");
@@ -343,60 +398,3 @@ void __init vic_init(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
 
 	vic_pm_register(base, irq_start, resume_sources);
 }
-
-/*
- * The PL190 cell from ARM has been modified by ST to handle 64 interrupts.
- * The original cell has 32 interrupts, while the modified one has 64,
- * replocating two blocks 0x00..0x1f in 0x20..0x3f. In that case
- * the probe function is called twice, with base set to offset 000
- *  and 020 within the page. We call this "second block".
- */
-static void __init vik_init_st(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
-				u32 vic_sources)
-{
-	unsigned int i;
-	int vic_2nd_block = ((unsigned long)base & ~PAGE_MASK) != 0;
-
-	/* Disable all interrupts initially. */
-
-	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_SELECT);
-	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
-	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
-	writel(0, base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS);
-	writel(0, base + VIC_ITCR);
-	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
-
-	/*
-	 * Make sure we clear all existing interrupts. The vector registers
-	 * in this cell are after the second block of general registers,
-	 * so we can address them using standard offsets, but only from
-	 * the second base address, which is 0x20 in the page
-	 */
-	if (vic_2nd_block) {
-		writel(0, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
-		for (i = 0; i < 19; i++) {
-			unsigned int value;
-
-			value = readl(base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
-			writel(value, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
-		}
-		/* ST has 16 vectors as well, but we don't enable them by now */
-		for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-			void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
-			writel(0, reg);
-		}
-
-		writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
-	}
-
-	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
-		if (vic_sources & (1 << i)) {
-			unsigned int irq = irq_start + i;
-
-			set_irq_chip(irq, &vic_chip);
-			set_irq_chip_data(irq, base);
-			set_irq_handler(irq, handle_level_irq);
-			set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
-		}
-	}
-} 

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization
  2009-09-25  1:56       ` H Hartley Sweeten
@ 2009-10-05 19:45         ` H Hartley Sweeten
  2009-10-09 16:46           ` H Hartley Sweeten
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2009-10-05 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Ping.. Any comments on this?

Regards,
Hartley 

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org [mailto:linux-arm-kernel-bounces at lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of H Hartley Sweeten
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:56 PM
To: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Cc: Linus Walleij; rubini-list at gnudd.com; Ben Dooks
Subject: RE: [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization

This reorganizes the vic.c code in anticipation of a future patch
to use struct vic_device as the data stored in set_irq_chip_data().

The new code has the following flow:

1) struct vic_device definition, static variables, and to_vic()
   moved to the start of the code.
2) vic power management callbacks
3) vic power management initialization/registration
4) irq_chip callbacks
5) vendor specific vic initialization
6) vic initialization

In addition the typo vik_init_st is fixed (vic_init_st).

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Cc: Alessandro Rubini <rubini-list@gnudd.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com>

---

V3 - rebased to 2.6.31-gitcur

diff --git a/arch/arm/common/vic.c b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
index f232941..c04f6ac 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/vic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
@@ -28,48 +28,6 @@
 #include <asm/mach/irq.h>
 #include <asm/hardware/vic.h>
 
-static void vic_ack_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
-	irq &= 31;
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
-	/* moreover, clear the soft-triggered, in case it was the reason */
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
-}
-
-static void vic_mask_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
-	irq &= 31;
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
-}
-
-static void vic_unmask_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
-	irq &= 31;
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
-}
-
-/**
- * vic_init2 - common initialisation code
- * @base: Base of the VIC.
- *
- * Common initialisation code for registeration
- * and resume.
-*/
-static void vic_init2(void __iomem *base)
-{
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-		void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
-		writel(VIC_VECT_CNTL_ENABLE | i, reg);
-	}
-
-	writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
-}
-
 #if defined(CONFIG_PM)
 /**
  * struct vic_device - VIC PM device
@@ -99,13 +57,34 @@ struct vic_device {
 /* we cannot allocate memory when VICs are initially registered */
 static struct vic_device vic_devices[CONFIG_ARM_VIC_NR];
 
+static int vic_id;
+
 static inline struct vic_device *to_vic(struct sys_device *sys)
 {
 	return container_of(sys, struct vic_device, sysdev);
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
 
-static int vic_id;
+/**
+ * vic_init2 - common initialisation code
+ * @base: Base of the VIC.
+ *
+ * Common initialisation code for registeration
+ * and resume.
+*/
+static void vic_init2(void __iomem *base)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
+		void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
+		writel(VIC_VECT_CNTL_ENABLE | i, reg);
+	}
 
+	writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
+}
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_PM)
 static int vic_class_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
 {
 	struct vic_device *vic = to_vic(dev);
@@ -159,31 +138,6 @@ struct sysdev_class vic_class = {
 };
 
 /**
- * vic_pm_register - Register a VIC for later power management control
- * @base: The base address of the VIC.
- * @irq: The base IRQ for the VIC.
- * @resume_sources: bitmask of interrupts allowed for resume sources.
- *
- * Register the VIC with the system device tree so that it can be notified
- * of suspend and resume requests and ensure that the correct actions are
- * taken to re-instate the settings on resume.
- */
-static void __init vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 resume_sources)
-{
-	struct vic_device *v;
-
-	if (vic_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(vic_devices))
-		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: too few VICs, increase CONFIG_ARM_VIC_NR\n", __func__);
-	else {
-		v = &vic_devices[vic_id];
-		v->base = base;
-		v->resume_sources = resume_sources;
-		v->irq = irq;
-		vic_id++;
-	}
-}
-
-/**
  * vic_pm_init - initicall to register VIC pm
  *
  * This is called via late_initcall() to register
@@ -219,9 +173,60 @@ static int __init vic_pm_init(void)
 
 	return 0;
 }
-
 late_initcall(vic_pm_init);
 
+/**
+ * vic_pm_register - Register a VIC for later power management control
+ * @base: The base address of the VIC.
+ * @irq: The base IRQ for the VIC.
+ * @resume_sources: bitmask of interrupts allowed for resume sources.
+ *
+ * Register the VIC with the system device tree so that it can be notified
+ * of suspend and resume requests and ensure that the correct actions are
+ * taken to re-instate the settings on resume.
+ */
+static void __init vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 resume_sources)
+{
+	struct vic_device *v;
+
+	if (vic_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(vic_devices))
+		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: too few VICs, increase CONFIG_ARM_VIC_NR\n", __func__);
+	else {
+		v = &vic_devices[vic_id];
+		v->base = base;
+		v->resume_sources = resume_sources;
+		v->irq = irq;
+		vic_id++;
+	}
+}
+#else
+static inline void vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 arg1) { }
+#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
+
+static void vic_ack_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+	irq &= 31;
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+	/* moreover, clear the soft-triggered, in case it was the reason */
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
+}
+
+static void vic_mask_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+	irq &= 31;
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+}
+
+static void vic_unmask_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+	irq &= 31;
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
+}
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_PM)
 static struct vic_device *vic_from_irq(unsigned int irq)
 {
         struct vic_device *v = vic_devices;
@@ -255,10 +260,7 @@ static int vic_set_wake(unsigned int irq, unsigned int on)
 
 	return 0;
 }
-
 #else
-static inline void vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 arg1) { }
-
 #define vic_set_wake NULL
 #endif /* CONFIG_PM */
 
@@ -270,9 +272,62 @@ static struct irq_chip vic_chip = {
 	.set_wake = vic_set_wake,
 };
 
-/* The PL190 cell from ARM has been modified by ST, so handle both here */
-static void vik_init_st(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
-			 u32 vic_sources);
+/*
+ * The PL190 cell from ARM has been modified by ST to handle 64 interrupts.
+ * The original cell has 32 interrupts, while the modified one has 64,
+ * replocating two blocks 0x00..0x1f in 0x20..0x3f. In that case
+ * the probe function is called twice, with base set to offset 000
+ *  and 020 within the page. We call this "second block".
+ */
+static void __init vic_init_st(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
+				u32 vic_sources)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+	int vic_2nd_block = ((unsigned long)base & ~PAGE_MASK) != 0;
+
+	/* Disable all interrupts initially. */
+
+	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_SELECT);
+	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
+	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+	writel(0, base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS);
+	writel(0, base + VIC_ITCR);
+	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
+
+	/*
+	 * Make sure we clear all existing interrupts. The vector registers
+	 * in this cell are after the second block of general registers,
+	 * so we can address them using standard offsets, but only from
+	 * the second base address, which is 0x20 in the page
+	 */
+	if (vic_2nd_block) {
+		writel(0, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
+		for (i = 0; i < 19; i++) {
+			unsigned int value;
+
+			value = readl(base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
+			writel(value, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
+		}
+		/* ST has 16 vectors as well, but we don't enable them by now */
+		for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
+			void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
+			writel(0, reg);
+		}
+
+		writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
+		if (vic_sources & (1 << i)) {
+			unsigned int irq = irq_start + i;
+
+			set_irq_chip(irq, &vic_chip);
+			set_irq_chip_data(irq, base);
+			set_irq_handler(irq, handle_level_irq);
+			set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
+		}
+	}
+}
 
 /**
  * vic_init - initialise a vectored interrupt controller
@@ -299,7 +354,7 @@ void __init vic_init(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
 
 	switch(vendor) {
 	case AMBA_VENDOR_ST:
-		vik_init_st(base, irq_start, vic_sources);
+		vic_init_st(base, irq_start, vic_sources);
 		return;
 	default:
 		printk(KERN_WARNING "VIC: unknown vendor, continuing anyways\n");
@@ -343,60 +398,3 @@ void __init vic_init(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
 
 	vic_pm_register(base, irq_start, resume_sources);
 }
-
-/*
- * The PL190 cell from ARM has been modified by ST to handle 64 interrupts.
- * The original cell has 32 interrupts, while the modified one has 64,
- * replocating two blocks 0x00..0x1f in 0x20..0x3f. In that case
- * the probe function is called twice, with base set to offset 000
- *  and 020 within the page. We call this "second block".
- */
-static void __init vik_init_st(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
-				u32 vic_sources)
-{
-	unsigned int i;
-	int vic_2nd_block = ((unsigned long)base & ~PAGE_MASK) != 0;
-
-	/* Disable all interrupts initially. */
-
-	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_SELECT);
-	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
-	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
-	writel(0, base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS);
-	writel(0, base + VIC_ITCR);
-	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
-
-	/*
-	 * Make sure we clear all existing interrupts. The vector registers
-	 * in this cell are after the second block of general registers,
-	 * so we can address them using standard offsets, but only from
-	 * the second base address, which is 0x20 in the page
-	 */
-	if (vic_2nd_block) {
-		writel(0, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
-		for (i = 0; i < 19; i++) {
-			unsigned int value;
-
-			value = readl(base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
-			writel(value, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
-		}
-		/* ST has 16 vectors as well, but we don't enable them by now */
-		for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-			void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
-			writel(0, reg);
-		}
-
-		writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
-	}
-
-	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
-		if (vic_sources & (1 << i)) {
-			unsigned int irq = irq_start + i;
-
-			set_irq_chip(irq, &vic_chip);
-			set_irq_chip_data(irq, base);
-			set_irq_handler(irq, handle_level_irq);
-			set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
-		}
-	}
-} 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization
  2009-10-05 19:45         ` H Hartley Sweeten
@ 2009-10-09 16:46           ` H Hartley Sweeten
  2009-10-12  9:02             ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2009-10-09 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

This reorganizes the vic.c code in anticipation of a future patch
to use struct vic_device as the data stored in set_irq_chip_data().

The new code has the following flow:

1) struct vic_device definition, static variables, and to_vic()
   moved to the start of the code.
2) vic power management callbacks
3) vic power management initialization/registration
4) irq_chip callbacks
5) vendor specific vic initialization
6) vic initialization

In addition the typo vik_init_st is fixed (vic_init_st).

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Cc: Alessandro Rubini <rubini-list@gnudd.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com>

---

V4 - rebased to 2.6.32-rc3 due to whitespace issue (Alessandro Rubini)
V3 - rebased to 2.6.31-gitcur


diff --git a/arch/arm/common/vic.c b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
index f232941..666153f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/vic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
@@ -28,48 +28,6 @@
 #include <asm/mach/irq.h>
 #include <asm/hardware/vic.h>
 
-static void vic_ack_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
-	irq &= 31;
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
-	/* moreover, clear the soft-triggered, in case it was the reason */
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
-}
-
-static void vic_mask_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
-	irq &= 31;
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
-}
-
-static void vic_unmask_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
-	irq &= 31;
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
-}
-
-/**
- * vic_init2 - common initialisation code
- * @base: Base of the VIC.
- *
- * Common initialisation code for registeration
- * and resume.
-*/
-static void vic_init2(void __iomem *base)
-{
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-		void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
-		writel(VIC_VECT_CNTL_ENABLE | i, reg);
-	}
-
-	writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
-}
-
 #if defined(CONFIG_PM)
 /**
  * struct vic_device - VIC PM device
@@ -99,13 +57,34 @@ struct vic_device {
 /* we cannot allocate memory when VICs are initially registered */
 static struct vic_device vic_devices[CONFIG_ARM_VIC_NR];
 
+static int vic_id;
+
 static inline struct vic_device *to_vic(struct sys_device *sys)
 {
 	return container_of(sys, struct vic_device, sysdev);
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
 
-static int vic_id;
+/**
+ * vic_init2 - common initialisation code
+ * @base: Base of the VIC.
+ *
+ * Common initialisation code for registeration
+ * and resume.
+*/
+static void vic_init2(void __iomem *base)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
+		void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
+		writel(VIC_VECT_CNTL_ENABLE | i, reg);
+	}
+
+	writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
+}
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_PM)
 static int vic_class_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
 {
 	struct vic_device *vic = to_vic(dev);
@@ -159,31 +138,6 @@ struct sysdev_class vic_class = {
 };
 
 /**
- * vic_pm_register - Register a VIC for later power management control
- * @base: The base address of the VIC.
- * @irq: The base IRQ for the VIC.
- * @resume_sources: bitmask of interrupts allowed for resume sources.
- *
- * Register the VIC with the system device tree so that it can be notified
- * of suspend and resume requests and ensure that the correct actions are
- * taken to re-instate the settings on resume.
- */
-static void __init vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 resume_sources)
-{
-	struct vic_device *v;
-
-	if (vic_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(vic_devices))
-		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: too few VICs, increase CONFIG_ARM_VIC_NR\n", __func__);
-	else {
-		v = &vic_devices[vic_id];
-		v->base = base;
-		v->resume_sources = resume_sources;
-		v->irq = irq;
-		vic_id++;
-	}
-}
-
-/**
  * vic_pm_init - initicall to register VIC pm
  *
  * This is called via late_initcall() to register
@@ -219,9 +173,60 @@ static int __init vic_pm_init(void)
 
 	return 0;
 }
-
 late_initcall(vic_pm_init);
 
+/**
+ * vic_pm_register - Register a VIC for later power management control
+ * @base: The base address of the VIC.
+ * @irq: The base IRQ for the VIC.
+ * @resume_sources: bitmask of interrupts allowed for resume sources.
+ *
+ * Register the VIC with the system device tree so that it can be notified
+ * of suspend and resume requests and ensure that the correct actions are
+ * taken to re-instate the settings on resume.
+ */
+static void __init vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 resume_sources)
+{
+	struct vic_device *v;
+
+	if (vic_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(vic_devices))
+		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: too few VICs, increase CONFIG_ARM_VIC_NR\n", __func__);
+	else {
+		v = &vic_devices[vic_id];
+		v->base = base;
+		v->resume_sources = resume_sources;
+		v->irq = irq;
+		vic_id++;
+	}
+}
+#else
+static inline void vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 arg1) { }
+#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
+
+static void vic_ack_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+	irq &= 31;
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+	/* moreover, clear the soft-triggered, in case it was the reason */
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
+}
+
+static void vic_mask_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+	irq &= 31;
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+}
+
+static void vic_unmask_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+	irq &= 31;
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
+}
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_PM)
 static struct vic_device *vic_from_irq(unsigned int irq)
 {
         struct vic_device *v = vic_devices;
@@ -255,10 +260,7 @@ static int vic_set_wake(unsigned int irq, unsigned int on)
 
 	return 0;
 }
-
 #else
-static inline void vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 arg1) { }
-
 #define vic_set_wake NULL
 #endif /* CONFIG_PM */
 
@@ -270,10 +272,62 @@ static struct irq_chip vic_chip = {
 	.set_wake = vic_set_wake,
 };
 
-/* The PL190 cell from ARM has been modified by ST, so handle both here */
-static void vik_init_st(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
-			 u32 vic_sources);
+/*
+ * The PL190 cell from ARM has been modified by ST to handle 64 interrupts.
+ * The original cell has 32 interrupts, while the modified one has 64,
+ * replocating two blocks 0x00..0x1f in 0x20..0x3f. In that case
+ * the probe function is called twice, with base set to offset 000
+ *  and 020 within the page. We call this "second block".
+ */
+static void __init vic_init_st(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
+				u32 vic_sources)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+	int vic_2nd_block = ((unsigned long)base & ~PAGE_MASK) != 0;
+
+	/* Disable all interrupts initially. */
+
+	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_SELECT);
+	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
+	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+	writel(0, base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS);
+	writel(0, base + VIC_ITCR);
+	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
+
+	/*
+	 * Make sure we clear all existing interrupts. The vector registers
+	 * in this cell are after the second block of general registers,
+	 * so we can address them using standard offsets, but only from
+	 * the second base address, which is 0x20 in the page
+	 */
+	if (vic_2nd_block) {
+		writel(0, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
+		for (i = 0; i < 19; i++) {
+			unsigned int value;
+
+			value = readl(base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
+			writel(value, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
+		}
+		/* ST has 16 vectors as well, but we don't enable them by now */
+		for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
+			void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
+			writel(0, reg);
+		}
+
+		writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
+		if (vic_sources & (1 << i)) {
+			unsigned int irq = irq_start + i;
 
+			set_irq_chip(irq, &vic_chip);
+			set_irq_chip_data(irq, base);
+			set_irq_handler(irq, handle_level_irq);
+			set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
+		}
+	}
+}
 /**
  * vic_init - initialise a vectored interrupt controller
  * @base: iomem base address
@@ -299,7 +353,7 @@ void __init vic_init(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
 
 	switch(vendor) {
 	case AMBA_VENDOR_ST:
-		vik_init_st(base, irq_start, vic_sources);
+		vic_init_st(base, irq_start, vic_sources);
 		return;
 	default:
 		printk(KERN_WARNING "VIC: unknown vendor, continuing anyways\n");
@@ -343,60 +397,3 @@ void __init vic_init(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
 
 	vic_pm_register(base, irq_start, resume_sources);
 }
-
-/*
- * The PL190 cell from ARM has been modified by ST to handle 64 interrupts.
- * The original cell has 32 interrupts, while the modified one has 64,
- * replocating two blocks 0x00..0x1f in 0x20..0x3f. In that case
- * the probe function is called twice, with base set to offset 000
- *  and 020 within the page. We call this "second block".
- */
-static void __init vik_init_st(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
-				u32 vic_sources)
-{
-	unsigned int i;
-	int vic_2nd_block = ((unsigned long)base & ~PAGE_MASK) != 0;
-
-	/* Disable all interrupts initially. */
-
-	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_SELECT);
-	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
-	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
-	writel(0, base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS);
-	writel(0, base + VIC_ITCR);
-	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
-
-	/*
-	 * Make sure we clear all existing interrupts. The vector registers
-	 * in this cell are after the second block of general registers,
-	 * so we can address them using standard offsets, but only from
-	 * the second base address, which is 0x20 in the page
-	 */
-	if (vic_2nd_block) {
-		writel(0, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
-		for (i = 0; i < 19; i++) {
-			unsigned int value;
-
-			value = readl(base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
-			writel(value, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
-		}
-		/* ST has 16 vectors as well, but we don't enable them by now */
-		for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-			void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
-			writel(0, reg);
-		}
-
-		writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
-	}
-
-	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
-		if (vic_sources & (1 << i)) {
-			unsigned int irq = irq_start + i;
-
-			set_irq_chip(irq, &vic_chip);
-			set_irq_chip_data(irq, base);
-			set_irq_handler(irq, handle_level_irq);
-			set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
-		}
-	}
-} 

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization
  2009-10-09 16:46           ` H Hartley Sweeten
@ 2009-10-12  9:02             ` Linus Walleij
  2009-10-12 17:01               ` H Hartley Sweeten
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2009-10-12  9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

2009/10/9 H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>:

> This reorganizes the vic.c code in anticipation of a future patch
> to use struct vic_device as the data stored in set_irq_chip_data().

I've tried to test this but I've got some real mangling problems when I
bring up the raw mail, =20 =3D and =<newline> all over the place,
I don't know if this is all my own fault, so that gmail mangles it.
Can you send me a copy as an attachment that I can test?

Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization
  2009-10-12  9:02             ` Linus Walleij
@ 2009-10-12 17:01               ` H Hartley Sweeten
  2009-12-21 16:05                 ` H Hartley Sweeten
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2009-10-12 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Monday, October 12, 2009 2:02 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2009/10/9 H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>:
>
>> This reorganizes the vic.c code in anticipation of a future patch
>> to use struct vic_device as the data stored in set_irq_chip_data().
> 
> I've tried to test this but I've got some real mangling problems when I
> bring up the raw mail, =20 =3D and =<newline> all over the place,
> I don't know if this is all my own fault, so that gmail mangles it.
> Can you send me a copy as an attachment that I can test?

Hello Linus,

Attached is the patch.  Hopefully it's gmail that's screwing it up...

Please see if this applies correctly.

Thanks,
Hartley
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: vic_reorg2.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 9660 bytes
Desc: vic_reorg2.patch
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20091012/3798bda8/attachment-0001.obj>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization
  2009-10-12 17:01               ` H Hartley Sweeten
@ 2009-12-21 16:05                 ` H Hartley Sweeten
  2010-01-07 22:15                   ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2009-12-21 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

[ARM] vic.c: reorganize code

This reorganizes the vic.c code in anticipation of a second patch
to use struct vic_device as the data stored in set_irq_chip_data().

The code now has the following flow:

1) struct vic_device definition, static variables, and to_vic()
   moved to the start of the code.
2) common code (vic_init2)
3) vic power management callbacks
4) vic power management initialization/registration
5) irq_chip callbacks
6) vendor specific vic initialization
7) vic initialization

In addition the typo vik_init_st is fixed (vic_init_st).

There is no functional change with this patch.

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Cc: Alessandro Rubini <rubini-list@gnudd.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com>

---

This patch had merge issues last time I posted it.  Hopefully it works now.
Rebased on 2.6.33-rc1.

diff --git a/arch/arm/common/vic.c b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
index f232941..1cf999a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/vic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
  * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
  * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA  02111-1307  USA
  */
+
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
@@ -28,48 +29,6 @@
 #include <asm/mach/irq.h>
 #include <asm/hardware/vic.h>
 
-static void vic_ack_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
-	irq &= 31;
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
-	/* moreover, clear the soft-triggered, in case it was the reason */
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
-}
-
-static void vic_mask_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
-	irq &= 31;
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
-}
-
-static void vic_unmask_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
-	irq &= 31;
-	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
-}
-
-/**
- * vic_init2 - common initialisation code
- * @base: Base of the VIC.
- *
- * Common initialisation code for registeration
- * and resume.
-*/
-static void vic_init2(void __iomem *base)
-{
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-		void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
-		writel(VIC_VECT_CNTL_ENABLE | i, reg);
-	}
-
-	writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
-}
-
 #if defined(CONFIG_PM)
 /**
  * struct vic_device - VIC PM device
@@ -99,13 +58,34 @@ struct vic_device {
 /* we cannot allocate memory when VICs are initially registered */
 static struct vic_device vic_devices[CONFIG_ARM_VIC_NR];
 
+static int vic_id;
+
 static inline struct vic_device *to_vic(struct sys_device *sys)
 {
 	return container_of(sys, struct vic_device, sysdev);
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
 
-static int vic_id;
+/**
+ * vic_init2 - common initialisation code
+ * @base: Base of the VIC.
+ *
+ * Common initialisation code for registeration
+ * and resume.
+*/
+static void vic_init2(void __iomem *base)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
+		void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
+		writel(VIC_VECT_CNTL_ENABLE | i, reg);
+	}
+
+	writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
+}
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_PM)
 static int vic_class_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
 {
 	struct vic_device *vic = to_vic(dev);
@@ -159,31 +139,6 @@ struct sysdev_class vic_class = {
 };
 
 /**
- * vic_pm_register - Register a VIC for later power management control
- * @base: The base address of the VIC.
- * @irq: The base IRQ for the VIC.
- * @resume_sources: bitmask of interrupts allowed for resume sources.
- *
- * Register the VIC with the system device tree so that it can be notified
- * of suspend and resume requests and ensure that the correct actions are
- * taken to re-instate the settings on resume.
- */
-static void __init vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 resume_sources)
-{
-	struct vic_device *v;
-
-	if (vic_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(vic_devices))
-		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: too few VICs, increase CONFIG_ARM_VIC_NR\n", __func__);
-	else {
-		v = &vic_devices[vic_id];
-		v->base = base;
-		v->resume_sources = resume_sources;
-		v->irq = irq;
-		vic_id++;
-	}
-}
-
-/**
  * vic_pm_init - initicall to register VIC pm
  *
  * This is called via late_initcall() to register
@@ -219,9 +174,60 @@ static int __init vic_pm_init(void)
 
 	return 0;
 }
-
 late_initcall(vic_pm_init);
 
+/**
+ * vic_pm_register - Register a VIC for later power management control
+ * @base: The base address of the VIC.
+ * @irq: The base IRQ for the VIC.
+ * @resume_sources: bitmask of interrupts allowed for resume sources.
+ *
+ * Register the VIC with the system device tree so that it can be notified
+ * of suspend and resume requests and ensure that the correct actions are
+ * taken to re-instate the settings on resume.
+ */
+static void __init vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 resume_sources)
+{
+	struct vic_device *v;
+
+	if (vic_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(vic_devices))
+		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: too few VICs, increase CONFIG_ARM_VIC_NR\n", __func__);
+	else {
+		v = &vic_devices[vic_id];
+		v->base = base;
+		v->resume_sources = resume_sources;
+		v->irq = irq;
+		vic_id++;
+	}
+}
+#else
+static inline void vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 arg1) { }
+#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
+
+static void vic_ack_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+	irq &= 31;
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+	/* moreover, clear the soft-triggered, in case it was the reason */
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
+}
+
+static void vic_mask_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+	irq &= 31;
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+}
+
+static void vic_unmask_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+	irq &= 31;
+	writel(1 << irq, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
+}
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_PM)
 static struct vic_device *vic_from_irq(unsigned int irq)
 {
         struct vic_device *v = vic_devices;
@@ -255,10 +261,7 @@ static int vic_set_wake(unsigned int irq, unsigned int on)
 
 	return 0;
 }
-
 #else
-static inline void vic_pm_register(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, u32 arg1) { }
-
 #define vic_set_wake NULL
 #endif /* CONFIG_PM */
 
@@ -270,9 +273,62 @@ static struct irq_chip vic_chip = {
 	.set_wake = vic_set_wake,
 };
 
-/* The PL190 cell from ARM has been modified by ST, so handle both here */
-static void vik_init_st(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
-			 u32 vic_sources);
+/*
+ * The PL190 cell from ARM has been modified by ST to handle 64 interrupts.
+ * The original cell has 32 interrupts, while the modified one has 64,
+ * replocating two blocks 0x00..0x1f in 0x20..0x3f. In that case
+ * the probe function is called twice, with base set to offset 000
+ *  and 020 within the page. We call this "second block".
+ */
+static void __init vic_init_st(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
+				u32 vic_sources)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+	int vic_2nd_block = ((unsigned long)base & ~PAGE_MASK) != 0;
+
+	/* Disable all interrupts initially. */
+
+	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_SELECT);
+	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
+	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+	writel(0, base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS);
+	writel(0, base + VIC_ITCR);
+	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
+
+	/*
+	 * Make sure we clear all existing interrupts. The vector registers
+	 * in this cell are after the second block of general registers,
+	 * so we can address them using standard offsets, but only from
+	 * the second base address, which is 0x20 in the page
+	 */
+	if (vic_2nd_block) {
+		writel(0, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
+		for (i = 0; i < 19; i++) {
+			unsigned int value;
+
+			value = readl(base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
+			writel(value, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
+		}
+		/* ST has 16 vectors as well, but we don't enable them by now */
+		for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
+			void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
+			writel(0, reg);
+		}
+
+		writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
+		if (vic_sources & (1 << i)) {
+			unsigned int irq = irq_start + i;
+
+			set_irq_chip(irq, &vic_chip);
+			set_irq_chip_data(irq, base);
+			set_irq_handler(irq, handle_level_irq);
+			set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
+		}
+	}
+}
 
 /**
  * vic_init - initialise a vectored interrupt controller
@@ -299,7 +355,7 @@ void __init vic_init(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
 
 	switch(vendor) {
 	case AMBA_VENDOR_ST:
-		vik_init_st(base, irq_start, vic_sources);
+		vic_init_st(base, irq_start, vic_sources);
 		return;
 	default:
 		printk(KERN_WARNING "VIC: unknown vendor, continuing anyways\n");
@@ -343,60 +399,3 @@ void __init vic_init(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
 
 	vic_pm_register(base, irq_start, resume_sources);
 }
-
-/*
- * The PL190 cell from ARM has been modified by ST to handle 64 interrupts.
- * The original cell has 32 interrupts, while the modified one has 64,
- * replocating two blocks 0x00..0x1f in 0x20..0x3f. In that case
- * the probe function is called twice, with base set to offset 000
- *  and 020 within the page. We call this "second block".
- */
-static void __init vik_init_st(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start,
-				u32 vic_sources)
-{
-	unsigned int i;
-	int vic_2nd_block = ((unsigned long)base & ~PAGE_MASK) != 0;
-
-	/* Disable all interrupts initially. */
-
-	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_SELECT);
-	writel(0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE);
-	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_ENABLE_CLEAR);
-	writel(0, base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS);
-	writel(0, base + VIC_ITCR);
-	writel(~0, base + VIC_INT_SOFT_CLEAR);
-
-	/*
-	 * Make sure we clear all existing interrupts. The vector registers
-	 * in this cell are after the second block of general registers,
-	 * so we can address them using standard offsets, but only from
-	 * the second base address, which is 0x20 in the page
-	 */
-	if (vic_2nd_block) {
-		writel(0, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
-		for (i = 0; i < 19; i++) {
-			unsigned int value;
-
-			value = readl(base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
-			writel(value, base + VIC_PL190_VECT_ADDR);
-		}
-		/* ST has 16 vectors as well, but we don't enable them by now */
-		for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
-			void __iomem *reg = base + VIC_VECT_CNTL0 + (i * 4);
-			writel(0, reg);
-		}
-
-		writel(32, base + VIC_PL190_DEF_VECT_ADDR);
-	}
-
-	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
-		if (vic_sources & (1 << i)) {
-			unsigned int irq = irq_start + i;
-
-			set_irq_chip(irq, &vic_chip);
-			set_irq_chip_data(irq, base);
-			set_irq_handler(irq, handle_level_irq);
-			set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
-		}
-	}
-} 

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization
  2009-12-21 16:05                 ` H Hartley Sweeten
@ 2010-01-07 22:15                   ` Linus Walleij
  2010-01-07 22:50                     ` H Hartley Sweeten
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2010-01-07 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

2009/12/21 H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>:

> [ARM] vic.c: reorganize code
> This reorganizes the vic.c code in anticipation of a second patch
> to use struct vic_device as the data stored in set_irq_chip_data().

I would love to test this patch but again cannot *for my life* decode this QP
stuff, having tried now for half an hour. Can you send it directly as an
attachment instead or even put it in Russells patch tracker?

Linus

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization
  2010-01-07 22:15                   ` Linus Walleij
@ 2010-01-07 22:50                     ` H Hartley Sweeten
  2010-01-12  8:34                       ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2010-01-07 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Thursday, January 07, 2010 3:16 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2009/12/21 H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>:
>
>> [ARM] vic.c: reorganize code
>> This reorganizes the vic.c code in anticipation of a second patch
>> to use struct vic_device as the data stored in set_irq_chip_data().
>
> I would love to test this patch but again cannot *for my life* decode
> this QP stuff, having tried now for half an hour. Can you send it
> directly as an attachment instead or even put it in Russells patch
> tracker?

What QP stuff?

Russell does not like the patch tracker used as a patch review system.
I have attached the patch, hopefully you have better results with that.

Regards,
Hartley
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: vic_reorg.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 9765 bytes
Desc: vic_reorg.patch
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20100107/bcfb9b64/attachment-0001.obj>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization
  2010-01-07 22:50                     ` H Hartley Sweeten
@ 2010-01-12  8:34                       ` Linus Walleij
  2010-01-12 12:19                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2010-01-12  8:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

2010/1/7 H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>:

> [ARM] vic.c: reorganize code
> This reorganizes the vic.c code in anticipation of a second patch
> to use struct vic_device as the data stored in set_irq_chip_data().

Works like a charm on the U300!
Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>

Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization
  2010-01-12  8:34                       ` Linus Walleij
@ 2010-01-12 12:19                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  2010-01-13 12:58                           ` Alessandro Rubini
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2010-01-12 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:34:41AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2010/1/7 H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>:
> 
> > [ARM] vic.c: reorganize code
> > This reorganizes the vic.c code in anticipation of a second patch
> > to use struct vic_device as the data stored in set_irq_chip_data().
> 
> Works like a charm on the U300!
> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>

Great, I guess the patch is ready.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization
  2010-01-12 12:19                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2010-01-13 12:58                           ` Alessandro Rubini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Alessandro Rubini @ 2010-01-13 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Fine on Nomadik too (the only one that uses 64 irqs in the vic, I suppose).
But I confirm the orignal mail doesn't apply. I used the one attached
as a non-git patch.

>> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>

Tested-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@unipv.it>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-13 12:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-17  0:32 [PATCH] arch/arm/common/vic.c: code reorganization H Hartley Sweeten
2009-09-18  8:55 ` Linus Walleij
2009-09-18 16:23   ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-09-18 16:31     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-18 16:33       ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-09-25  1:56       ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-10-05 19:45         ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-10-09 16:46           ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-10-12  9:02             ` Linus Walleij
2009-10-12 17:01               ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-12-21 16:05                 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2010-01-07 22:15                   ` Linus Walleij
2010-01-07 22:50                     ` H Hartley Sweeten
2010-01-12  8:34                       ` Linus Walleij
2010-01-12 12:19                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-13 12:58                           ` Alessandro Rubini

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).