From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: change boot requirements [Was: make PHYS_OFFSET determined at run time (unfinished)]
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:32:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100125173201.GA14834@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100122115831.GA8377@pengutronix.de>
Hello,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:58:31PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> just a short status report: The code seems to work OK if PHYS_OFFSET is
> determined correctly.
>
> The problem is when it does not. Currently I place arch/arm/boot/Image
> at 0xa1008000[1] with PHYS_OFFSET being 0xa0000000. Then
> arch/arm/boot/head.S guesses PHYS_OFFSET to be 0xa1000000 resulting
> __va(bank->start) of my only bank to be 0xbf000000. And so this bank is
> discarded by sanity_check_meminfo as 0xbf000000 overlaps the vmalloc
> region.
>
> So how to proceed? These possiblities come to (my) mind:
>
> - parse the atag list to better guess phys_offset
> (both zImage and Image would need to do that)
> - require that zImage and Image are placed such that the guess is done
> right (which is stupid for zImage as then the decompressor needs to
> move the decompressed image)
> - require the bootloader to pass phys_offset (r3?)
> - make the ram mapping non-linear
> - don't discard the whole bank, only the addresses overlaping the
> vmalloc region
>
> Anything else? Preferences? Thoughts?
I'd like to go forward here and if I don't hear anything here I'll start
requiring that the bootloader sets r3=PHYS_OFFSET as this seems the most
robust solution to me.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-25 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-19 8:38 make PHYS_OFFSET determined at run time (unfinished) Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-19 8:43 ` [PATCH] arm: don't define unused symbol initrd_phys for zImage Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-19 8:43 ` [PATCH] arm: add a comment to __atags_pointer describing where it's set Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-19 8:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-19 8:43 ` [PATCH] arm: remove support for old way to pass kernel parameters Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-19 8:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-19 9:13 ` [PATCH] arm: deprecate " Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-19 20:26 ` make PHYS_OFFSET determined at run time (unfinished) Ryan Mallon
2010-01-20 0:55 ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-20 2:21 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-20 2:32 ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-20 14:39 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-20 14:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-21 1:28 ` jassi brar
2010-01-21 2:15 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-01-21 11:57 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-21 12:48 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-21 11:43 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-21 12:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-21 15:22 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-22 12:32 ` jassi brar
2010-01-20 9:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-20 8:38 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-22 11:58 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-25 17:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2010-01-25 19:32 ` change boot requirements [Was: make PHYS_OFFSET determined at run time (unfinished)] Ryan Mallon
2010-01-30 21:02 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-30 21:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] zImage: don't hard code the stack size twice Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-30 21:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] uImage: require passing a LOADADDR when building with RUNTIME_PHYSOFFSET Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-30 21:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] Allow PHYS_OFFSET to be runtime determined Uwe Kleine-König
2010-02-04 9:51 ` change boot requirements [Was: make PHYS_OFFSET determined at run time (unfinished)] Uwe Kleine-König
2010-02-04 9:52 ` [PATCH] arm: remove bit-rotten STANDALONE_DEBUG for decompressor Uwe Kleine-König
2010-02-12 11:03 ` [PULL REQUEST] runtime physoffset [Was: change boot requirements] Uwe Kleine-König
2010-03-08 12:15 ` Amit Kucheria
2010-03-22 21:09 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100125173201.GA14834@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).