From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ben-linux@fluff.org (Ben Dooks) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:24:47 +0000 Subject: [PATCHv2 01/10] ARM: S3C2443: GPIO: Correct AC97 pin defines In-Reply-To: <1b68c6791001270015o4d5f42b8k858b959816c9b7c9@mail.gmail.com> References: <1264571873-14924-1-git-send-email-jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> <20100127081140.GK9153@trinity.fluff.org> <1b68c6791001270015o4d5f42b8k858b959816c9b7c9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100127082447.GL9153@trinity.fluff.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:15:28PM +0900, jassi brar wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Ben Dooks wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 02:57:53PM +0900, jassisinghbrar at gmail.com wrote: > >> From: Jassi Brar > >> > >> GPIO_E-[5,9] pin functionality was defined incorrectly. > >> The patch corrects and adds missing pins. > > > > Ok, should I apply this to the fixes tree and send to linus? > Honestly speaking, I don't know. Please do as you see due. > Maybe Mark Brown, as an affected maintainer, has some opinion? > thanks Ok, couple of questions: 1) Is it currently causing an working driver to fail? 2) Will it break anything currently in the kernel if merged now? I'll await Mark's comments. -- Ben Q: What's a light-year? A: One-third less calories than a regular year.