From: jamie@shareable.org (Jamie Lokier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Add SWP/SWPB emulation for ARMv7 processors (v4)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:52:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100128145205.GB24679@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1264685461.7064.65.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 13:07 +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > The SWP instruction was deprecated in the ARMv6 architecture, superseded
> > by the LDREX/STREX family of instructions for
> > load-linked/store-conditional operations. The ARMv7 multiprocessing
> > extensions mandate that SWP/SWPB instructions are treated as undefined
> > from reset, with the ability to enable them through the System Control
> > Register SW bit.
> >
> > This patch adds the alternative solution to emulate the SWP and SWPB
> > instructions using LDREX/STREX sequences, and log statistics to
> > /proc/cpu/swp_emulation. To correctly deal with copy-on-write, it also
> > modifies cpu_v7_set_pte_ext to change the mappings to priviliged RO when
> > user RO.
>
> Just a thought - could we not add another kuser helper in the vectors
> page that does this? Your exception trapping code would set regs->ARM_lr
> to the next instruction following SWP and regs->ARM_pc to the helper.
That would corrupt LR seen by userspace, wouldn't it?
Userspace assumes SWP/SWPB do not change LR.
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-28 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-14 13:07 [PATCH] ARM: Add SWP/SWPB emulation for ARMv7 processors (v4) Leif Lindholm
2010-01-28 13:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-01-28 14:52 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2010-01-28 15:45 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100128145205.GB24679@shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox