From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] arm: enable support for software perf events
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 17:40:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100202174000.GB29701@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263471256-3739-5-git-send-email-jamie.iles@picochip.com>
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:14:15PM +0000, Jamie Iles wrote:
> The perf events subsystem allows counting of both hardware and
> software events. This patch implements the bare minimum for software
> performance events.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles <jamie.iles@picochip.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> ---
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 ++
> arch/arm/include/asm/perf_event.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/mm/fault.c | 7 +++++++
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/perf_event.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index 293a879..72646b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ config ARM
> select HAVE_KERNEL_GZIP
> select HAVE_KERNEL_LZO
> select GENERIC_ATOMIC64
This conflicts - this select is only if !CPU_32v6K in my kernel.
What's the implication? Does this perf stuff require these atomic64
stuff (in which case, those symbols should only be selected if
GENERIC_ATOMIC64 is also selected.)
Please sort this out.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-02 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-14 12:14 ARM perf events support v5 Jamie Iles
2010-01-14 12:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm: provide a mechanism to reserve performance counters Jamie Iles
2010-01-14 12:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm/oprofile: reserve the PMU when starting Jamie Iles
2010-01-14 12:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm: use the spinlocked, generic atomic64 support Jamie Iles
2010-01-14 12:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm: enable support for software perf events Jamie Iles
2010-01-14 12:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm/perfevents: implement perf event support for ARMv6 Jamie Iles
2010-01-21 9:39 ` Jamie Iles
2010-01-21 10:28 ` Will Deacon
2010-01-21 10:37 ` Jamie Iles
2010-01-21 10:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-21 10:56 ` Will Deacon
2010-01-21 12:21 ` Jean Pihet
2010-01-21 12:27 ` Jamie Iles
2010-01-21 12:32 ` Jean Pihet
2010-01-21 14:04 ` Jamie Iles
2010-01-21 12:34 ` Will Deacon
2010-01-21 12:42 ` Jean Pihet
2010-01-22 15:25 ` Will Deacon
2010-01-21 12:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-26 16:03 ` Tomasz Fujak
2010-01-26 16:09 ` Jamie Iles
2010-01-26 16:11 ` Jean Pihet
2010-01-26 17:47 ` Jean Pihet
2010-01-27 17:26 ` Will Deacon
2010-01-27 17:40 ` Jean Pihet
2010-01-27 17:57 ` Will Deacon
2010-01-28 11:26 ` Jamie Iles
2010-01-30 16:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-02 17:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-02 17:28 ` Jamie Iles
2010-02-02 17:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-02-02 18:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm: enable support for software perf events Will Deacon
2010-02-02 18:48 ` Jamie Iles
2010-02-02 19:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-02 19:28 ` Jamie Iles
2010-02-05 6:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm/oprofile: reserve the PMU when starting George G. Davis
2010-02-05 9:13 ` Jamie Iles
2010-01-21 9:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm: provide a mechanism to reserve performance counters Jamie Iles
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-04 10:48 ARM perf events support v4 Jamie Iles
2010-01-04 10:48 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm: provide a mechanism to reserve performance counters Jamie Iles
2010-01-04 10:48 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm/oprofile: reserve the PMU when starting Jamie Iles
2010-01-04 10:48 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm: use the spinlocked, generic atomic64 support Jamie Iles
2010-01-04 10:48 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm: enable support for software perf events Jamie Iles
2010-01-04 11:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-04 12:26 ` Jamie Iles
2010-01-04 12:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-12-15 11:15 ARMv6 performance counters v3 Jamie Iles
2009-12-15 11:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm: provide a mechanism to reserve performance counters Jamie Iles
2009-12-15 11:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm/oprofile: reserve the PMU when starting Jamie Iles
2009-12-15 11:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm: use the spinlocked, generic atomic64 support Jamie Iles
2009-12-15 11:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm: enable support for software perf events Jamie Iles
2009-12-14 14:04 ARMv6 performance counters v2 Jamie Iles
2009-12-14 14:04 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm: provide a mechanism to reserve performance counters Jamie Iles
2009-12-14 14:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm/oprofile: reserve the PMU when starting Jamie Iles
2009-12-14 14:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm: use the spinlocked, generic atomic64 support Jamie Iles
2009-12-14 14:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm: enable support for software perf events Jamie Iles
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100202174000.GB29701@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).