From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Clean up ARM compressed loader
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:30:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100224153028.GA28805@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B8543B2.4030004@marcansoft.com>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 04:20:18PM +0100, Hector Martin wrote:
> Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > It does work with the previous version of the decompressor.
>
> Sure, at this point in time. The broken code is still the loader, not
> the new decompressor. If a GCC update had been the culprit, it wouldn't
> be GCC's fault. The fact remains that the behavior is undefined and
> (with current GCC versions) requires carefully crafting the resulting C
> code in order to get reasonable behavior. I don't think you can
> reasonably require that a generic descompressor be maintained by others
> with care for compatibility with this hack; someone would have to police
> changes for potential issues, and you still have a decent chance of
> getting breakage if GCC decides to change its behavior some day. I'd say
> fixing the loader to not require this undefined behavior is a
> considerably better long-term solution.
>
> > I noticed that you did not reply to my previous email on this subject,
> > are you intentionally ignoring my responses?
>
> You had a valid point which I hadn't considered (running ROM images from
> RAM), so I figured I'd give addressing that a shot before going into
> discussion mode.
Independant of the outcome of this discussion I suggest reverting the
switch to the new decompressor for .33. Hectors patch definitely isn't
.33 material and broken or not the old decompressor was more reliable.
In general I would welcome to get rid of -Dstatic=, but it needs
careful consideration.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-24 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-23 13:57 [PATCH] Clean up ARM compressed loader hector at marcansoft.com
2010-02-23 14:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-24 8:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-02-24 9:27 ` Hector Martin
2010-02-24 11:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-24 15:20 ` Hector Martin
2010-02-24 15:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2010-02-24 22:09 ` Hector Martin
2010-02-24 22:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-25 0:01 ` Hector Martin
2010-02-24 16:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-24 2:23 Hector Martin
2010-02-24 8:51 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-02-24 9:28 ` Hector Martin
2010-02-24 22:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-24 23:34 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-02-24 23:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-24 23:57 ` Hector Martin
2010-02-25 0:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-25 0:30 ` Hector Martin
2010-02-25 4:28 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-02-25 4:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-02-25 9:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-25 10:05 ` Hector Martin
2010-02-25 18:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-02-25 19:21 ` Hector Martin
2010-02-25 19:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-02-25 19:56 ` Hector Martin
2010-02-25 20:29 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-02-25 21:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-25 21:25 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-02-25 20:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-25 12:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-25 19:24 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-02-25 19:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-25 23:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-25 23:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-25 9:51 ` Hector Martin
2010-02-25 18:30 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-02-25 8:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-25 4:06 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100224153028.GA28805@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).