From: ben-linux@fluff.org (Ben Dooks)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PULL] Pull request for for-rmk/samsung5
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:14:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100228161419.GI30679@trinity.fluff.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100226195944.GA23933@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 07:59:45PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 04:09:24PM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 08:53:01PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:09:19AM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > > > Sorry for the late request, but haven't been very well. Quite a bit of
> > > > this update has been on list for a while, but only just been merged
> > > > together into one tree.
> > > >
> > > > This is the last of the Samsung updates that need to go via RMK, they
> > > > are mostly plat-s3c/plat-s3c64xx and machine squashed and the new
> > > > S5P6442 and S5PV210 code.
> > > >
> > > > Included are some updates for the current code to avoid build or runtime
> > > > problems with other updates such as via the ASoC tree.
> > > >
> > > > I will be doing a seperate set of updates direct to Linus once these are
> > > > merged to fix and outstanding problems, any updates such as S3C2443 clock
> > > > rewrite and anything else not directly relying on arch/arm modifications.
> > > >
> > > > There will also be a set of documentation updates to deal with the current
> > > > shifts and outline anything else that needs to be done.
> > > >
> > > > Anything urgent, please cc: me directly.
> > > >
> > > > The following changes since commit ab5d97db1c6ced3e95c00d097931471707032b1f:
> > > > Ben Dooks (1):
> > > > ARM: SAMSUNG: Fix bad use of __initdata for s3c_register_clocks()
> > > >
> > > > are available in the git repository at:
> > > >
> > > > git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git for-rmk/samsung5
> > >
> > > This gives me conflicts in arch/arm/Makefile and arch/arm/Kconfig. I'll
> > > need to investigate, which I'll do over the weekend.
> >
> > Very probably, this is based of the for-rmk/samsung3 branch which has
> > very likely diverged from your branch. Thanks for looking at it.
>
> When you say that, are you saying that the contents of the samsung3
> branch which I pulled aren't relevant anymore?
No, the samsung3 is the last pulled one, and the samsung4 and then
samsung5 are direct descendants of samsung3 and have not had any
changes fed back from your dev tree.
--
Ben
Q: What's a light-year?
A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-28 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-25 0:09 [PULL] Pull request for for-rmk/samsung5 Ben Dooks
2010-02-25 20:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-26 16:09 ` Ben Dooks
2010-02-26 19:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-28 16:14 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2010-03-02 23:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-04 23:16 ` Ben Dooks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100228161419.GI30679@trinity.fluff.org \
--to=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).