From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: akpm@linux-foundation.org (Andrew Morton) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:04:01 -0800 Subject: Current status of interrupt handling capability of pca953x gpio driver. In-Reply-To: <3131fcab4adc999286a99435352e1deb.squirrel@www.loen.fr> References: <3131fcab4adc999286a99435352e1deb.squirrel@www.loen.fr> Message-ID: <20100302160401.bc8b73df.akpm@linux-foundation.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:42:20 -0000 (GMT) "Marc Zyngier" wrote: > > On Mon, March 1, 2010 16:18, javier Martin wrote: > > Hi, > > I saw a recent mail from Marc Zyngier on December about adding interrupt > > handling capability to pca953x gpio driver. ( > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2009-December/006651.html > > ) > > There has not been any activity since then (or at least I couldn't find > > anything). What is the status regarding to mainline of these features? > > > > Have changes proposed by Marc Zyngier accepted? If not, what points have to > > be improved? > > The patch is currently at it's 4th iteration (posted in February on LKML > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/5/282) and sitting in Andrew Morton's mm tree. > It also has been successfully used on Blackfin boards. > > When it comes to mainline merging, I really have no clue. The patch received very > little public comment (I only received a few private emails from people using it). > > So if someone higher up in the food chain wants to carry that patch in his tree > and push it upstream, I can give it a respin. > I was planning on merging gpio-pca953xc-add-interrupt-handling-capability.patch gpio-pca953xc-add-interrupt-handling-capability-fix.patch gpio-pca953xc-add-interrupt-handling-capability-v4.patch into 2.6.34 unless someone stops me.