From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:19:57 +0000
Subject: board/device file names, and machine names
In-Reply-To: <20100303101759.GA10499@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
References: <1267565398.8759.77.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
	<20100302235137.GC29715@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<1267576760.8759.164.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
	<20100303084244.GD29715@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20100303091728.GA31740@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
	<20100303094757.GB22482@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20100303100022.GA7175@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
	<20100303100847.GA30607@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20100303101759.GA10499@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Message-ID: <20100303101957.GA9848@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:18:00AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> > > > > > Given the amount of discussion there's already been, I'm going to come
> > > > > > down hard on this issue to kill the discussion.
> 
> > > So... dwalker is maintainer of arch-msm, and does not like the
> > > codenames. Then you come, and just because are maintainer of arm,
> > > override the decision, without even notifying l-k?
> > 
> > So you don't think that Daniel, who was *explicitly* asking for my
> > suggestions and opinions, is entitled to a clear and straight
> > answer?
> 
> When someone asks for your suggestions, you can "go down hard on this
> issue"?

It's clear that all you want to have is an argument.  This ends here.