* [PATCH v2] CLKDEV: return from clk_find as soon as we get maching clk
@ 2010-03-03 6:48 Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-03 10:33 ` Uwe Kleine-König
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Viresh KUMAR @ 2010-03-03 6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
clk_find function looks for clock with matching dev_id and con_id.
We should return from clk_find as soon as we get a clock with matching dev_id
and con_id. This can be done by comparing variable "match" with 3.
v2:
- remove if (match == 0), check.
- move match==3 in if (match > best) condition
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
---
arch/arm/common/clkdev.c | 7 ++++---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/clkdev.c b/arch/arm/common/clkdev.c
index aae5bc0..efd53f7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/clkdev.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/clkdev.c
@@ -52,12 +52,13 @@ static struct clk *clk_find(const char *dev_id, const char *con_id)
continue;
match += 1;
}
- if (match == 0)
- continue;
if (match > best) {
clk = p->clk;
- best = match;
+ if (match != 3)
+ best = match;
+ else
+ break;
}
}
return clk;
--
1.6.0.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] CLKDEV: return from clk_find as soon as we get maching clk
2010-03-03 6:48 [PATCH v2] CLKDEV: return from clk_find as soon as we get maching clk Viresh KUMAR
@ 2010-03-03 10:33 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-03-03 12:01 ` Viresh KUMAR
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2010-03-03 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:18:27PM +0530, Viresh KUMAR wrote:
> clk_find function looks for clock with matching dev_id and con_id.
> We should return from clk_find as soon as we get a clock with matching dev_id
> and con_id. This can be done by comparing variable "match" with 3.
>
> v2:
> - remove if (match == 0), check.
> - move match==3 in if (match > best) condition
can you take the changes since v1 out of the changelog. They usually go
...
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
> ---
... here.
Does this mean you understood Russell's hint?
Did you test the differences your patch results in for the generated
code?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] CLKDEV: return from clk_find as soon as we get maching clk
2010-03-03 10:33 ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2010-03-03 12:01 ` Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-04 9:29 ` Uwe Kleine-König
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Viresh KUMAR @ 2010-03-03 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hello,
On 3/3/2010 4:03 PM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:18:27PM +0530, Viresh KUMAR wrote:
>> clk_find function looks for clock with matching dev_id and con_id.
>> We should return from clk_find as soon as we get a clock with matching dev_id
>> and con_id. This can be done by comparing variable "match" with 3.
>>
>> v2:
>> - remove if (match == 0), check.
>> - move match==3 in if (match > best) condition
> can you take the changes since v1 out of the changelog. They usually go
> ...
OK.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
>> ---
> Does this mean you understood Russell's hint?
Truly speaking i didn't get it completely, but i think Russsell is
referring to multiple return points from a function.
Russell, Am I getting it correctly ?
> Did you test the differences your patch results in for the generated
> code?
I think they are essentially same, we now just have a single return point
in the new patch.
regards,
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] CLKDEV: return from clk_find as soon as we get maching clk
2010-03-03 12:01 ` Viresh KUMAR
@ 2010-03-04 9:29 ` Uwe Kleine-König
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2010-03-04 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hello,
> > Does this mean you understood Russell's hint?
>
> Truly speaking i didn't get it completely, but i think Russsell is
> referring to multiple return points from a function.
>
> Russell, Am I getting it correctly ?
>
> > Did you test the differences your patch results in for the generated
> > code?
>
> I think they are essentially same, we now just have a single return point
> in the new patch.
Well then,
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-04 9:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-03 6:48 [PATCH v2] CLKDEV: return from clk_find as soon as we get maching clk Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-03 10:33 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-03-03 12:01 ` Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-04 9:29 ` Uwe Kleine-König
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).