From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:28:32 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] mmp: support ssp in pxa168
In-Reply-To: <771cded01003100514r70f0f53eydda7b916f92bef64@mail.gmail.com>
References: <771cded01003100514r70f0f53eydda7b916f92bef64@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20100310142832.GB24422@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:14:42AM -0500, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> From 75fe4b02234f6476e72827508f11f1035d7aaf68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>
> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:32:43 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] [ARM] mmp: support ssp in pxa168
> 
> Support ssp in pxa168. The basic function of SSP is same as pxa, but clock
> source and IRQ is changed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

That said might it make sense to merge this and the previous patch via
ASoC since there's new drivers using this following on and Liam's
multi-codec work is likely to be creating merge issues this development
cycle?  I can apply the patches on a branch by themselves which can also
be pulled into the PXA tree if needed.