From: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca (Mathieu Desnoyers)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] [RFC] arm: add half-word __xchg
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:12:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100319021222.GA17388@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100319014906.GC14108@shareable.org>
* Jamie Lokier (jamie at shareable.org) wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > But.. thinking about it. It's bad to have a 2-byte xchg primitive that
> > only works on UP and breaks the build on SMP. We should instead
> > implement a workaround based on __cmpxchg4 to perform the 2-byte xchg().
>
> This exposes why there should be __cmpxchg_bool() versions, which do
> not loop, preferably in the generic kernel API, because the workaround
> using __cmpxchg4 has to add yet another pointless loop nesting to all
> cmpxchg users.
The workaround I propose is to use __cmpxchg4 in a loop for 2-byte xchg()
fallback on arm; it is not related to cmpxchg() in any way. I don't
think one single use-case justifies the creation of a __cmpxchg_bool()
across all architectures.
Also, I've never seen where having a cmpxchg primitive returning a
boolean is more efficient than returning the value read, ever. If we
have to loop, then we can re-use the value that has been read by
cmpxchg, while the version returning a boolean would need a read to
re-read the next value.
So.. I am afraid I am probably missing your point entirely, because I
don't see how this can improve anything.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> --- Jamie
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-19 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-10 16:22 __xchg for sizes other than 32bit Imre Deak
2010-03-10 17:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-10 20:02 ` [PATCH] ARM support single byte cmpxchg and cmpxchg_local on ARMv6 Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-10 20:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-10 21:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-10 23:16 ` __xchg for sizes other than 32bit Jamie Lokier
2010-03-18 9:29 ` [PATCH 1/1] [RFC] arm: add half-word __xchg Alexander Shishkin
2010-03-18 12:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-18 12:37 ` Alexander Shishkin
2010-03-18 13:33 ` Alexander Shishkin
2010-03-18 13:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-18 16:33 ` Imre Deak
2010-03-18 17:21 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-18 19:00 ` Imre Deak
2010-03-18 19:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-19 1:49 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-03-19 2:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2010-03-19 3:36 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-03-25 15:52 ` [PATCH 1/1] [RFCv2] " Alexander Shishkin
2010-03-25 16:42 ` Alexander Shishkin
2010-03-27 22:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-28 0:14 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-03-28 0:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-28 1:00 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-28 14:39 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100319021222.GA17388@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).