From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PULL REQUEST] runtime physoffset [Was: change boot requirements]
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:09:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100322210946.GE10157@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100308121550.GC9233@matterhorn.verdurent.com>
Hello,
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 02:15:50PM +0200, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On 10 Feb 12, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > Hello Russell,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:51:47AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > > > The following changes since commit 499a2673713c85734a54c37dd90b4b729de399c4:
> > > > Linus Torvalds (1):
> > > > Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/.../dtor/input
> > > >
> > > > are available in the git repository at:
> > > >
> > > > git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/linux-2.6.git arm/booting
> > >
> > > Can you please pull this branch for the .34 merge window? Since the
> > > last post one new patch was added to that branch. I'll send it in reply
> > > to this mail.
> > Do you consider pulling? If not, can you please say why?
> >
> > Best regards
> > Uwe
>
> Bumping up this thread since these patches are necessary to reach our
> eventual goal of a common kernel.
Actually the patches in arm/booting are only some cleanups. This series
contained in arm/booting doesn't contain the two runtime physoffset
patches[1]
Russell?
Best regards
Uwe
[1] these are in my arm/booting-pu branch
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-22 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-19 8:38 make PHYS_OFFSET determined at run time (unfinished) Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-19 8:43 ` [PATCH] arm: don't define unused symbol initrd_phys for zImage Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-19 8:43 ` [PATCH] arm: add a comment to __atags_pointer describing where it's set Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-19 8:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-19 8:43 ` [PATCH] arm: remove support for old way to pass kernel parameters Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-19 8:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-19 9:13 ` [PATCH] arm: deprecate " Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-19 20:26 ` make PHYS_OFFSET determined at run time (unfinished) Ryan Mallon
2010-01-20 0:55 ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-20 2:21 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-20 2:32 ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-20 14:39 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-20 14:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-21 1:28 ` jassi brar
2010-01-21 2:15 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-01-21 11:57 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-21 12:48 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-21 11:43 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-21 12:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-21 15:22 ` Steve Chen
2010-01-22 12:32 ` jassi brar
2010-01-20 9:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-20 8:38 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-22 11:58 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-25 17:32 ` change boot requirements [Was: make PHYS_OFFSET determined at run time (unfinished)] Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-25 19:32 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-01-30 21:02 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-30 21:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] zImage: don't hard code the stack size twice Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-30 21:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] uImage: require passing a LOADADDR when building with RUNTIME_PHYSOFFSET Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-30 21:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] Allow PHYS_OFFSET to be runtime determined Uwe Kleine-König
2010-02-04 9:51 ` change boot requirements [Was: make PHYS_OFFSET determined at run time (unfinished)] Uwe Kleine-König
2010-02-04 9:52 ` [PATCH] arm: remove bit-rotten STANDALONE_DEBUG for decompressor Uwe Kleine-König
2010-02-12 11:03 ` [PULL REQUEST] runtime physoffset [Was: change boot requirements] Uwe Kleine-König
2010-03-08 12:15 ` Amit Kucheria
2010-03-22 21:09 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100322210946.GE10157@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).