linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lethal@linux-sh.org (Paul Mundt)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [C/R ARM][PATCH 3/3] c/r: ARM implementation of checkpoint/restart
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:02:08 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100326030208.GA5815@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100326024759.GN19308@shareable.org>

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 02:47:59AM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > >> We checkpoint whether the system is running with CONFIG_MMU or not and
> > >> require the same configuration for the system on which we restore the
> > >> process. It might be possible to allow something more fine-grained,
> > >> if it's worth the energy. Input on this item is also very welcome,
> > >> specifically from someone who knows the exact meaning of the end_brk
> > >> field.
> > >
> > > Processes which run on MMU and non-MMU CPUs are unlikely to be
> > > interchangable - the run time environments are quite different. ?I
> > > think this is a sane check.
> > >
> > thanks.
> 
> It's possible in principle to run many non-MMU binaries on MMU
> kernels, but I've never heard of anyone doing it.
> 
FDPIC supports running the same binaries with or without MMU depending on
your ABI, it's not really that uncommon, even if it's mostly just used
for prototyping.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-26  3:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-22  1:06 [C/R ARM][PATCH 0/3] Linux Checkpoint-Restart - ARM port Christoffer Dall
2010-03-22  1:06 ` [C/R ARM][PATCH 1/3] ARM: Rudimentary syscall interfaces Christoffer Dall
2010-03-23 20:53   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-24  2:03     ` Matt Helsley
2010-03-24  4:57       ` Oren Laadan
2010-03-24 14:02         ` Matt Helsley
2010-03-24 15:53           ` Oren Laadan
2010-03-24 19:36             ` Christoffer Dall
2010-03-25  1:11               ` Matt Helsley
2010-03-25  1:17                 ` Matt Helsley
2010-03-25 10:29                   ` Christoffer Dall
2010-03-25  1:35                 ` Oren Laadan
2010-03-25 10:34                   ` Christoffer Dall
2010-03-22  1:06 ` [C/R ARM][PATCH 2/3] ARM: Add the eclone system call Christoffer Dall
2010-03-23 21:06   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-24 18:19     ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2010-03-24 19:42     ` Christoffer Dall
2010-03-22  1:06 ` [C/R ARM][PATCH 3/3] c/r: ARM implementation of checkpoint/restart Christoffer Dall
2010-03-23 16:09   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-03-24 19:46     ` Christoffer Dall
2010-03-23 21:18   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-24  1:53     ` Matt Helsley
2010-03-24 20:48     ` Christoffer Dall
2010-03-26  2:47       ` Jamie Lokier
2010-03-26  3:02         ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2010-03-26  3:55           ` Jamie Lokier
2010-03-28 22:55           ` Christoffer Dall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100326030208.GA5815@linux-sh.org \
    --to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).