From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:30:47 +0100 Subject: [GIT PULL] generic arm for MSM In-Reply-To: <20100326082300.GA6665@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1269553937.21793.40.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <1269557364.21793.52.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <20100325225300.GK24984@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1269557655.21793.53.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <20100325225555.GL24984@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1269559307.21793.78.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <20100326081445.GB20553@pengutronix.de> <20100326082300.GA6665@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20100326093047.GB14697@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello, > There shouldn't be any problem; that tree is an identical copy of my > local tree which uses no alternatives. It always contains an entire > set of Linus' tree with no additional repacking. > > The only reason to pull this tree into a copy of Linus' tree is that > it'll avoid fetching 400MB or so of Linus' pack files over http from > the UK, instead only fetching 34MB of objects. I looked some time ago and IIRC you had all of Linus' tree in a single pack file. This resulted in trying to download these 400MB even though I only missed one day's worth of commits. So today I always do git remote update linus rmk which works well most of the time. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |