From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: rabin@rab.in (Rabin Vincent)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:26:26 +0530
Subject: [RFC] Initial attempt to make ARM use LMB
In-Reply-To: <20100410070305.GA2445@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <20100325233248.GM24984@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20100408153111.GA2598@debian>
	<20100408182715.GF31407@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20100409111105.GA2804@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20100410034224.GA22637@debian>
	<20100410070305.GA2445@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <20100410115626.GA680@debian>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 08:03:05AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 09:12:24AM +0530, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 12:11:05PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > Here's a revised version which should resolve the initrd problem.
> > 
> > It does, after the missing call to lmb_init() is added.
> 
> Which missing call?

This one:

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
index bc341c4..f1e0f5d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
@@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ void __init arm_lmb_init(struct meminfo *mi, struct machine_desc *mdesc)
 {
 	int i;
 
+	lmb_init();
 	for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_banks; i++)
 		lmb_add(mi->bank[i].start, mi->bank[i].size);