From: daniel@caiaq.de (Daniel Mack)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv4 2.6.34-rc4 5/7] mxc: Add generic USB HW initialization for MX51
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:38:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100419073859.GA30801@buzzloop.caiaq.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100419010340.GB15308@matterhorn.verdurent.com>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 04:03:40AM +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On 10 Apr 17, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > > @@ -18,6 +19,7 @@
> > >
> > > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > #include <linux/io.h>
> > > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > >
> > > #include <mach/hardware.h>
> > > #include <mach/mxc_ehci.h>
> > > @@ -50,9 +52,14 @@
> > > #define MX35_H1_TLL_BIT (1 << 5)
> > > #define MX35_H1_USBTE_BIT (1 << 4)
> > >
> > > -int mxc_set_usbcontrol(int port, unsigned int flags)
> > > +int mxc_intialize_usb_hw(int port, unsigned int flags)
> >
> > This patch and the next one should be merged into one. The reason is
> > that you rename a function here and the next patch follows that change.
> > Especially when bisecting, this can lead to uncompilable checkouts of
> > the tree when stopping in the middle.
>
> Also, patch 3 really belongs with this patch too since the #defines in
> patch 3 are used here.
Well, as long as the defines are commited _before_ their users, it
should be fine. But they can also be squashed into one, that's true.
Thanks,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-19 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-16 19:16 [PATCHv4 2.6.34-rc4 1/7] mxc: Update GPIO for USB support on Freescale MX51 Babbage HW Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com
2010-04-16 19:16 ` [PATCHv4 2.6.34-rc4 2/7] mx5: Add USB device definitions for " Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com
2010-04-16 19:16 ` [PATCHv4 2.6.34-rc4 3/7] mxc: Add new defines for USB HW register bits on Freescale SoCs Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com
2010-04-16 19:16 ` [PATCHv4 2.6.34-rc4 4/7] mx5: Enable board specific functions for enabling USB host on Babbage Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com
2010-04-16 19:16 ` [PATCHv4 2.6.34-rc4 5/7] mxc: Add generic USB HW initialization for MX51 Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com
2010-04-16 19:16 ` [PATCHv4 2.6.34-rc4 6/7] mxc-usb: Add call to initialize MXC USB HW registers Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com
2010-04-16 19:16 ` [PATCHv4 2.6.34-rc4 7/7] mx5: Add USB to Freescale MX51 defconfig Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com
2010-04-17 17:07 ` [PATCHv4 2.6.34-rc4 5/7] mxc: Add generic USB HW initialization for MX51 Daniel Mack
2010-04-19 1:03 ` Amit Kucheria
2010-04-19 7:38 ` Daniel Mack [this message]
2010-04-18 2:07 ` Sascha Hauer
2010-04-19 15:40 ` [PATCHv4 2.6.34-rc4 5/7] mxc: Add generic USB HWinitialization " Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2010-04-19 15:58 ` Sascha Hauer
2010-04-19 16:59 ` Daniel Mack
2010-04-19 17:04 ` Daniel Mack
2010-04-19 0:32 ` [PATCHv4 2.6.34-rc4 2/7] mx5: Add USB device definitions for Freescale MX51 Babbage HW Amit Kucheria
2010-04-19 14:48 ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100419073859.GA30801@buzzloop.caiaq.de \
--to=daniel@caiaq.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).