* [GIT PULL] omap fixes for v2.6.34-rc5
@ 2010-04-26 19:00 Tony Lindgren
2010-04-27 15:31 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2010-04-26 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Linus,
Please pull omap fixes from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git omap-fixes-for-linus
Regards,
Tony
The following changes since commit b91ce4d14a21fc04d165be30319541e0f9204f15:
Linus Torvalds (1):
Merge git://git.kernel.org/.../davem/net-2.6
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git omap-fixes-for-linus
Aaro Koskinen (2):
omap: fix clocksource_32k to start from zero
omap: delete unused bootloader tag variables
Abraham Arce (1):
OMAP4: Clocks: Change SPI Instance Names
Enric Balletbo i Serra (1):
omap3: Fix EHCI port for IGEP v2 board
Felipe Balbi (1):
arm: omap1: remove dead code from timer32k.c
Francisco Alecrim (1):
n8x0_defconfig: remove CONFIG_NILFS2_FS override
Janusz Krzysztofik (1):
omap: gpio: fix incorrect matching of IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH
Jarkko Nikula (2):
omap: rx51_defconfig: Remove duplicate phonet
omap: rx51_defconfig: Remove CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED*=y options
Rajendra Nayak (1):
OMAP4: prcm: Use logical OR instead of bitwise OR
Ranjith Lohithakshan (1):
OMAP3: clock: fix enable bit used for dpll4_m4x2 clock
Richard Woodruff (1):
omap4: Fix build break when used with gcc-4.4.1 (2009-q3)
Santosh Shilimkar (2):
OMAP4: Fix for CONTROL register Base
omap4: Fix McBSP4 base address
Sergio Aguirre (7):
OMAP3: serial: Check for zero-based physical addr
OMAP3: serial: Use dev_* macros instead of printk
omap2/3/4: serial: Remove condition for getting uart4_phys
omap3: zoom2/3 / 3630sdp: Don't init always all uarts
omap3: 3630sdp: Explicitly enable all UARTs
omap3: zoom 2/3: Change debugboard serial port id
omap3: zoom2/3: Register only 1 8250 port
Thara Gopinath (2):
OMAP: HWMOD: Adding clockdomain check
OMAP: HWMOD: Bug fixes in hwmod structure definitions
Thomas Weber (8):
omap: Devkit8000: Fix wrong usb port on Devkit8000
omap: board-sdp-flash.c: Fix typos in debug output
omap: Devkit8000: Fix typo in supplies
omap: Devkit8000: Add missing package selection
omap: Devkit8000: Fix typo in pin name
omap: Devkit8000: Remove unnecessary include file
omap: Devkit8000: Change position of init calls
omap: Devkit8000: Remove unused pins
Tony Lindgren (4):
Merge branch 'omap-fixes-for-tony' of git://dev.omapzoom.org/pub/scm/saaguirre/linux-omap-camera into omap-fixes-for-linus
Merge branch 'for_2.6.34rc_a' of git://git.pwsan.com/linux-2.6 into omap-fixes-for-linus
omap2: Fix ARM processor check for 24xx
omap: Fix n8x0 mmc_mmc_init compile warnings and typos
kishore kadiyala (1):
OMAP4-HSMMC: FIX for MMC5 Controller IRQ Base
manjugk manjugk (1):
omap: DMA: Init CDAC to zero
stanley.miao (4):
omap: fix the compile error if CONFIG_MTD_NAND_OMAP2 is notenabled
omap: remove one of the define of INT_34XX_BENCH_MPU_EMUL
AM3517: initialize i2c subsystem after mux subsystem
omap: fix a gpmc nand problem
arch/arm/configs/n8x0_defconfig | 1 -
arch/arm/configs/omap_zoom2_defconfig | 2 +-
arch/arm/configs/omap_zoom3_defconfig | 2 +-
arch/arm/configs/rx51_defconfig | 3 --
arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer32k.c | 15 ---------
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig | 6 ++-
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-3630sdp.c | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-am3517evm.c | 4 +-
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-devkit8000.c | 39 +++++------------------
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-igep0020.c | 8 ++--
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c | 18 +++++-----
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-sdp-flash.c | 8 ++--
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-debugboard.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-peripherals.c | 1 -
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock3xxx_data.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c | 8 ++--
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c | 6 ++--
arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.c | 3 ++
arch/arm/mach-omap2/include/mach/entry-macro.S | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-headsmp.S | 6 ++--
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap44xx-smc.S | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c | 3 ++
arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c | 4 +-
arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c | 35 +++++++++++----------
arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c | 22 ++++++++-----
arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c | 9 +++++
arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c | 6 ++--
arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/irqs.h | 2 -
arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mcbsp.h | 2 +-
arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/nand.h | 7 ++++
arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap44xx.h | 2 +-
arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_hwmod.h | 2 +-
34 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] omap fixes for v2.6.34-rc5
2010-04-26 19:00 [GIT PULL] omap fixes for v2.6.34-rc5 Tony Lindgren
@ 2010-04-27 15:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-27 16:12 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-04-27 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> Please pull omap fixes from:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git omap-fixes-for-linus
I pulled it this time, but I'm starting to get really irritated with you.
These look like real fixes, but quite frankly, by -rc5, that IS NOT
ENOUGH.
They need to be _regressions_, not just cleanups and fixes for things that
have never worked. And this is starting to be a pattern with the omap
tree: you're not honoring the merge window properly.
Just "it's a bug-fix" or "it's deleting unused code" is not enough. The
point of the late -rc series is to fix problems from the merge window, not
add new changes. I realize that you think that all the new changes are
obviously good, but the fact is, bugs happen even in "obvious bug-fixes".
And that's why we have the rule about late-rc pulls being about
_regressions_ and/or major oopses/security issues. Not just random
development that are meant to improve things.
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] omap fixes for v2.6.34-rc5
2010-04-27 15:31 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2010-04-27 16:12 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-04-27 16:35 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2010-04-27 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> [100427 08:28]:
>
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >
> > Please pull omap fixes from:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git omap-fixes-for-linus
>
> I pulled it this time, but I'm starting to get really irritated with you.
>
> These look like real fixes, but quite frankly, by -rc5, that IS NOT
> ENOUGH.
>
> They need to be _regressions_, not just cleanups and fixes for things that
> have never worked. And this is starting to be a pattern with the omap
> tree: you're not honoring the merge window properly.
>
> Just "it's a bug-fix" or "it's deleting unused code" is not enough. The
> point of the late -rc series is to fix problems from the merge window, not
> add new changes. I realize that you think that all the new changes are
> obviously good, but the fact is, bugs happen even in "obvious bug-fixes".
>
> And that's why we have the rule about late-rc pulls being about
> _regressions_ and/or major oopses/security issues. Not just random
> development that are meant to improve things.
OK point taken. I should have dealt with this earlier. Will only queue
regressions after -rc3 or so.
Regards,
Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] omap fixes for v2.6.34-rc5
2010-04-27 16:12 ` Tony Lindgren
@ 2010-04-27 16:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-27 16:58 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-04-27 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> OK point taken. I should have dealt with this earlier. Will only queue
> regressions after -rc3 or so.
Note that the "only regressions" is certainly not a hard rule. Anything
that would be valid for -stable is obviously always valid: security
issues, major oopses etc etc.
But the "only regressions" should kind of be the guiding line, and the
others are more like "this is so serious that it should go in regardless
of anything else".
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] omap fixes for v2.6.34-rc5
2010-04-27 16:35 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2010-04-27 16:58 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2010-04-27 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> [100427 09:31]:
>
>
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >
> > OK point taken. I should have dealt with this earlier. Will only queue
> > regressions after -rc3 or so.
>
> Note that the "only regressions" is certainly not a hard rule. Anything
> that would be valid for -stable is obviously always valid: security
> issues, major oopses etc etc.
Sure.
> But the "only regressions" should kind of be the guiding line, and the
> others are more like "this is so serious that it should go in regardless
> of anything else".
OK. I guess was using criteria like "this is needed to boot this and that
board in a usable way" and "let's get all the fixes in" criteria, but that
should have been done way earlier.
Regards,
Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-27 16:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-26 19:00 [GIT PULL] omap fixes for v2.6.34-rc5 Tony Lindgren
2010-04-27 15:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-27 16:12 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-04-27 16:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-27 16:58 ` Tony Lindgren
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).