linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: pmu: provide a registration mechanism for IRQs [v3]
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:36:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100428213619.GA16525@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1269530198-19572-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 03:16:32PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> This is version 3 of the patch series originally posted here:
> 
> v1: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-March/011162.html
> v2: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-March/011339.html

Unfortunately, these patches are inter-dependent - if I apply the
realview patch to my 'versatile' branch without the first patch, then
it breaks the realview build because ARM_PMU_DEVICE_CPU is not defined.

But if I apply the first patch initially, everything using the new
PMU infrastructure breaks until the other patches are applied.

Please can we have an ordered set which doesn't break compilation.
What I think should happen is the first patch should introduce the
new definitions required for the platform data, and the rest of the
first patch should come at the very end.

Thanks.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-28 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-25 15:16 [PATCH 0/6] ARM: pmu: provide a registration mechanism for IRQs [v3] Will Deacon
2010-03-25 15:16 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: pmu: register IRQs at runtime Will Deacon
2010-03-25 15:16   ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: Realview: register PMU IRQs during board initialisation Will Deacon
2010-03-25 15:16     ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: OMAP: " Will Deacon
2010-03-25 15:16       ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: BCMRING: register PMU IRQ " Will Deacon
2010-03-25 15:16         ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: iop3xx: register PMU IRQs " Will Deacon
2010-03-25 15:16           ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: pxa: " Will Deacon
2010-03-25 17:35         ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: BCMRING: register PMU IRQ " Leo (Hao) Chen
2010-03-25 15:36   ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: pmu: register IRQs at runtime Jamie Iles
2010-04-28 21:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-04-29 16:04   ` [PATCH 0/6] ARM: pmu: provide a registration mechanism for IRQs [v3] Will Deacon
2010-04-29 16:05     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-04-29 16:15       ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100428213619.GA16525@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).