linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2] [ARM] Add ARCH_PROVIDES_UDELAY config option
Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 11:01:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100501100148.GE12172@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d3xgd20n.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 03:11:20PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> writes:
> 
> > An alternative to this patch would be to add a config option to use
> > sched_clock() to provide the counter instead of the cycle loop.  The
> > same loops_per_jiffy calibration could be done to  determine the
> > sched_clock frequency.  Any machine with an available constant tick
> > rate counter, which is likely to be used for sched_clock() already,
> > can enable CONFIG_UDELAY_USES_SCHED_CLOCK.
> 
> Or even better, why not have an option to use the clocksource which is
> most likely using the constant tick timer as well.

We may be running into the same problem which we did with the printk
clock - that is using a machine provided sched_clock() or clocksource
requires MMIO accesses, which can only be done after the IO mappings
have been initialized.

Let's hope no one ever uses udelay() before the necessary IO mappings
are present.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-01 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-30 19:12 [PATCH V2] [ARM] Add ARCH_PROVIDES_UDELAY config option Colin Cross
2010-04-30 19:37 ` Colin Cross
2010-04-30 22:11   ` Kevin Hilman
2010-05-01  0:04     ` Saravana Kannan
2010-05-01 10:01     ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-05-21 22:01       ` Saravana Kannan
2010-05-21 22:06         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-21 22:10           ` Saravana Kannan
2010-05-28  0:41           ` Saravana Kannan
2010-06-22  1:14             ` Saravana Kannan
2010-06-28  2:30               ` Colin Cross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100501100148.GE12172@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).