From: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca (Mathieu Desnoyers)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] [RFCv3] arm: add half-word __xchg
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 13:27:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100503172755.GA4248@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1272741897-30369-1-git-send-email-virtuoso@slind.org>
* Alexander Shishkin (virtuoso at slind.org) wrote:
> On systems where ldrexh/strexh are not available,
> * for pre-v6 systems, use a generic local version,
> * for v6 without v6K, emulate xchg2 using 32-bit cmpxchg()
> (it is not yet clear if xchg1 has to be emulated on such
> systems as well, thus the "size" parameter).
>
> The __xchg_generic() function is based on the code that Jamie
> posted earlier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <virtuoso@slind.org>
> CC: linux-arm-kernel-bounces at lists.infradead.org
> CC: Imre Deak <imre.deak@nokia.com>
> CC: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
> CC: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/system.h | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h
> index d65b2f5..7a5983f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h
> @@ -218,6 +218,39 @@ do { \
> last = __switch_to(prev,task_thread_info(prev), task_thread_info(next)); \
> } while (0)
>
> +#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6
> +
> +#include <linux/align.h>
> +
> +static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old,
> + unsigned long new, int size);
> +
> +/*
> + * emulate __xchg() using 32-bit __cmpxchg()
> + */
> +static inline unsigned long __xchg_generic(unsigned long x,
> + volatile void *ptr, int size)
> +{
> + unsigned long *ptrbig = object_align_floor((unsigned long *)ptr);
ptrbig could be renamed to something more relevant. Maybe ptralign ?
> + int shift = ((unsigned)ptr - (unsigned)ptrbig) * 8;
"unsigned int" everywhere above would be cleaner. Also, it's worth
checking the generated assembly: does gcc perform the transformation:
* 8 -> << 3 automatically ?
> + unsigned long mask, add, ret;
> +
> + mask = ~(((1 << (size * 8)) - 1) << shift);
Maybe better to do:
+ mask = ~((((1UL << 3) << size) - 1) << shift);
But, other question: what assumptions are you doing about endianness
here ? I recall that ARM supports switchable endianness. Dunno about the
Linux-specific case though.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> + add = x << shift;
> +
> + ret = *ptrbig;
> + while (1) {
> + unsigned long tmp = __cmpxchg(ptrbig, ret, (ret & mask) | add,
> + 4);
> + if (tmp == ret)
> + break;
> + ret = tmp;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> #if defined(CONFIG_CPU_SA1100) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_SA110)
> /*
> * On the StrongARM, "swp" is terminally broken since it bypasses the
> @@ -262,6 +295,22 @@ static inline unsigned long __xchg(unsigned long x, volatile void *ptr, int size
> : "r" (x), "r" (ptr)
> : "memory", "cc");
> break;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_32v6K
> + case 2:
> + asm volatile("@ __xchg2\n"
> + "1: ldrexh %0, [%3]\n"
> + " strexh %1, %2, [%3]\n"
> + " teq %1, #0\n"
> + " bne 1b"
> + : "=&r" (ret), "=&r" (tmp)
> + : "r" (x), "r" (ptr)
> + : "memory", "cc");
> + break;
> +#else
> + case 2:
> + ret = __xchg_generic(x, ptr, 2);
> + break;
> +#endif
> case 4:
> asm volatile("@ __xchg4\n"
> "1: ldrex %0, [%3]\n"
> @@ -283,6 +332,13 @@ static inline unsigned long __xchg(unsigned long x, volatile void *ptr, int size
> raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
> break;
>
> + case 2:
> + raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> + ret = *(volatile unsigned short *)ptr;
> + *(volatile unsigned short *)ptr = x;
> + raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
> + break;
> +
> case 4:
> raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> ret = *(volatile unsigned long *)ptr;
> --
> 1.7.1.1.g15764
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-03 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-28 1:22 [RFC PATCH] create generic alignment api (v2) Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-28 15:40 ` Imre Deak
2010-03-28 18:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-29 0:09 ` [RFC PATCH] create generic alignment api (v5) Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <20100501183544.GC27062@shisha.kicks-ass.net>
2010-05-01 19:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <20100501192915.GD27062@shisha.kicks-ass.net>
2010-05-01 19:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-05-01 19:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] create generic alignment api (v6) Alexander Shishkin
2010-05-01 19:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] [RFCv3] arm: add half-word __xchg Alexander Shishkin
2010-05-03 17:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
[not found] ` <20100505080155.GF27062@shisha.kicks-ass.net>
2010-05-08 23:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-05-06 18:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] create generic alignment api (v6) Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100503172755.GA4248@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).