* [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: use voltage number array in 88pm860x
@ 2010-05-05 5:35 Haojian Zhuang
2010-05-05 11:18 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Haojian Zhuang @ 2010-05-05 5:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: use voltage number array in 88pm860x
2010-05-05 5:35 [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: use voltage number array in 88pm860x Haojian Zhuang
@ 2010-05-05 11:18 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2010-05-05 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:35:59AM -0400, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> From 5dbf0d4d5ad601b508730a8d0f5a41a1edb92561 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>
> Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 09:54:51 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] regulator: use voltage number array in 88pm860x
>
> A lot of condition comparision statements are used in original driver. These
> statements are used to check the boundary of voltage numbers since voltage
> number isn't linear.
>
> Now use array of voltage numbers instead. Clean code with simpler way.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>
> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Again I'm not clear on the changes but this does actually still look OK
for me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-05 11:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-05 5:35 [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: use voltage number array in 88pm860x Haojian Zhuang
2010-05-05 11:18 ` Mark Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).