linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/8] arm: allow passing an ELF64 header to elf_check_arch()
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 12:20:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100510112036.GC14337@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c8da055f0a84cfd1c6659d9fda24e4eb97ab9fb.1273041358.git.ext-mika.1.westerberg@nokia.com>

On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 09:54:18AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> This is needed to shut following compiler warning when CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE is
> enabled:
> 
> fs/proc/vmcore.c: In function 'parse_crash_elf64_headers':
> fs/proc/vmcore.c:500: warning: passing argument 1 of 'elf_check_arch' from
> incompatible pointer type
> 
> ELF32 and ELF64 headers have common fields of same size (namely e_ident and
> e_machine) which are checked in arm_elf_check_arch().

This patch is bogus - and shows the dangers of throwing casts into C code
to shut up warnings without first analysing the code.

Our elf_check_arch() uses:
	e_machine
	e_entry
	e_flags
thusly:
        if (x->e_machine != EM_ARM)
        if (x->e_entry & 1) {
        } else if (x->e_entry & 3)
        eflags = x->e_flags;

Now, the Elf32 header looks like this:

typedef struct elf32_hdr{
  unsigned char e_ident[EI_NIDENT];	/* 0x00 - 0x0F */
  Elf32_Half    e_type;			/* 0x10 - 0x11 */
  Elf32_Half    e_machine;		/* 0x12 - 0x13 */
  Elf32_Word    e_version;		/* 0x14 - 0x17 */
  Elf32_Addr    e_entry;		/* 0x18 - 0x1b */
  Elf32_Off     e_phoff;		/* 0x1c - 0x1f */
  Elf32_Off     e_shoff;		/* 0x20 - 0x23 */
  Elf32_Word    e_flags;		/* 0x24 - 0x27 */

and Elf64 header:

typedef struct elf64_hdr {
  unsigned char e_ident[EI_NIDENT];	/* 0x00 - 0x0F */
  Elf64_Half e_type;			/* 0x10 - 0x11 */
  Elf64_Half e_machine;			/* 0x12 - 0x13 */
  Elf64_Word e_version;			/* 0x14 - 0x17 */
  Elf64_Addr e_entry;			/* 0x18 - 0x1f */
  Elf64_Off e_phoff;			/* 0x20 - 0x27 */
  Elf64_Off e_shoff;			/* 0x28 - 0x2f */
  Elf64_Word e_flags;			/* 0x30 - 0x33 */

Notice that e_entry and e_flags are different sizes and/or different
offsets, so ARMs elf_check_arch can not work with elf64 headers.  So
with an ELF64 header, accessing e_flags will result in actually
accessing the top half of the 64-bit e_phoff, and accessing 32-bit
e_entry will get us the lower half of the 64-bit e_entry.

Now, here's the question: why does this crashkernel stuff want to
parse a 64-bit ELF header on a 32-bit only platform where the crashing
kernel will never generate a 64-bit ELF core file?

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-10 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-05  6:54 [PATCH v2 0/8] Initial implementation of kdump for ARM Mika Westerberg
2010-05-05  6:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] arm: kdump: reserve memory for crashkernel Mika Westerberg
2010-05-05  6:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] arm: kdump: implement crash_setup_regs() Mika Westerberg
2010-05-05  6:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] arm: kdump: implement machine_crash_shutdown() Mika Westerberg
2010-05-05  6:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] arm: kdump: skip indirection page when crashing Mika Westerberg
2010-05-05  6:54 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] arm: kdump: implement copy_oldmem_page() Mika Westerberg
2010-05-05  6:54 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] arm: allow passing an ELF64 header to elf_check_arch() Mika Westerberg
2010-05-10 11:20   ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-05-10 12:09     ` Mika Westerberg
2010-05-10 12:21       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-11  7:17         ` Mika Westerberg
2010-07-16  8:14         ` Mika Westerberg
2010-08-25  2:40           ` Lei Wen
2010-08-25 12:29             ` Mika Westerberg
2010-05-05  6:54 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] arm: kdump: add support for elfcorehdr= parameter Mika Westerberg
2010-05-05  6:54 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] arm: kdump: add CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP Kconfig option Mika Westerberg
2010-05-25  8:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] Initial implementation of kdump for ARM Mika Westerberg
2010-06-11  6:36   ` Mika Westerberg
2010-07-02 12:48     ` Per Fransson
2010-07-05  8:28       ` Mika Westerberg
2010-07-05 10:01         ` Per Fransson
2010-07-05 10:18           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-05 10:34             ` Per Fransson
2010-07-05 11:31               ` Mika Westerberg
2010-07-05 12:04                 ` Per Fransson
2010-07-05 13:55               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-05 14:05                 ` Per Fransson
2010-07-05 14:19                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-05 15:37                     ` Per Fransson
2010-07-05 16:08                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-07-05 18:14                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-06  8:30                         ` Per Fransson
2010-07-07  7:29                           ` Mika Westerberg
2010-07-08  8:52                             ` Per Fransson
2010-07-12  8:20                               ` Mika Westerberg
2010-07-09  3:38                 ` Simon Horman
2010-07-09  8:19                   ` Per Fransson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100510112036.GC14337@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).