From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 21:04:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] ARM: Implement read/write for ownership in the
	ARMv6 DMA cache ops
In-Reply-To: <F6216D87-F137-4071-B593-AC561876D083@marvell.com>
References: <20100504163823.26355.58568.stgit@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
	<20100504164426.26355.19161.stgit@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
	<309002C0DA137042828828FC53D7A93492FA312B64@IL-MB01.marvell.com>
	<1273672539.23818.96.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
	<20100512184852.GC22371@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20100512185903.GD22371@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<F6216D87-F137-4071-B593-AC561876D083@marvell.com>
Message-ID: <20100512200434.GE22371@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:00:42PM +0300, Ronen Shitrit wrote:
> This is a good point, assuming the patch will lock the int a round the  
> dma cache calls, can you think of any data coruption issues?

FIQs?