linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Rampant ext3/4 corruption on 2.6.34-rc7 with VIVT ARM (Marvell 88f5182)
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 18:59:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100514175927.GA18107@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100514174153.GB10133@shareable.org>

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 06:41:53PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 08:47:11AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > Now, in the case at hand, which is my ARM based NAS, I believe this
> > > is non cache-coherent and thus uses cache flush ops. I don't know ARM
> > > well enough but I would expect these to be implicit barriers. Russell ?
> > > Nico ?
> > 
> > ARMv5 doesn't have a weak memory ordering model, and doesn't have any
> > memory barrier instructions.
> 
> It does have buffered writes, doesn't it?  Are they always flushed by
> the cache flush ops?

Surprisingly, for DMA it's something we've always done.  Odd that.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-14 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-11  9:23 Rampant ext3/4 corruption on 2.6.34-rc7 with VIVT ARM (Marvell 88f5182) Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-05-11 10:16 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-05-11 10:47   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-05-11 10:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-05-11 11:14   ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-05-12 22:21     ` Jamie Lokier
2010-05-12 22:47       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-05-12 23:08         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-14 17:41           ` Jamie Lokier
2010-05-14 17:59             ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-05-12 23:41         ` James Bottomley
2010-05-13  0:18           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-05-13 15:39             ` James Bottomley
2010-05-13 23:53               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-05-13  3:12         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-05-13  4:42           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-05-12 15:00   ` Jan Kara
2010-05-12 22:13     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-05-13  0:15     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-05-13 15:12       ` Jan Kara
2010-05-13 21:33         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-05-13 23:51         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100514175927.GA18107@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).