From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ben-linux@fluff.org (Ben Dooks) Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 06:53:19 +0100 Subject: Samsung SoCs framebuffer re-work In-Reply-To: References: <20100518025058.GL27571@trinity.fluff.org> Message-ID: <20100518055319.GP27571@trinity.fluff.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:09:25PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Ben Dooks wrote: > > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 08:59:29AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > >> Hi Ben, > >> > >> Currently there's only one fb drivers for samsung SocS. but it's based > >> on s3c24xx and a part of s3c64xx. > > > > Your statement is incorrect, we have the s3c2410-fb driver which deals > > with the 2410/2440/2412 style hardware and s3c-fb which is for the newer > > devices. > > Yes it's working on s5pc110. I mean it's not fit the platform requirement. ? > > > >> As you can see the s5pc110 (aka s5pv210) spec, It has more features > >> and interconnection between FIMC and FIMD. > >> So current fb driver can't handle these features well. So LSI make a > >> own fb drivers and use it. You can see the code at their git repo. > >> > >> Now we are re-implement or change it for s5pc110 and for future usages. > >> How do you think? > > > > I've already got updates for s3c-fb to work on 2416,2443 and the c110/v210 > > systems. I am talking with the relevant people at System.LSI to get our > > drivers closers together, possibly we can get this done for the current > > merge window. > > You mean you want to use the current fb drivers for s5pc110 also? > Then how to do implement features mentioned by Kukjin? Well, apart from the fact that quite a lot of them are actually features that are in all versions of this block, we intend to create some patches and send them to the relevant lists... -- Ben Q: What's a light-year? A: One-third less calories than a regular year.