From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Boot interface for device trees on ARM
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 13:08:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100519120843.GB24520@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilJl9_NHiT1LITG7UbA9S7OYsnGMcDAsFEEx5Ob@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 05:57:55AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> side question: Do recent ARM SoCs provide any facility to reliably
> detected the silicon at run time? ie. like the processor (unique to
> core) and system (unique to SoC) id registers on PowerPC.
No.
Every SoC is effectively unique in all aspects. There is no common
physical memory layout, no common interrupt controller, no common
timer, etc. The base addresses for everything is also SoC specific,
so it's a catch-22 situation - you need to know what the SoC is to
be able to find out where various registers and memory is located.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-19 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-18 2:54 Boot interface for device trees on ARM Jeremy Kerr
2010-05-18 4:34 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-05-18 5:24 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-05-18 8:49 ` David Gibson
2010-05-18 12:24 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-05-18 14:06 ` Jason McMullan
2010-05-19 0:21 ` David Gibson
2010-05-19 0:28 ` David Gibson
2010-05-19 1:28 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-05-19 6:50 ` David Gibson
2010-05-19 14:45 ` Grant Likely
2010-05-19 1:41 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-05-19 7:12 ` David Gibson
2010-05-19 14:21 ` Grant Likely
2010-05-19 7:25 ` Mitch Bradley
2010-05-19 8:50 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-05-18 11:57 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-05-19 12:13 ` Grant Likely
2010-05-19 16:45 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-05-19 17:10 ` Grant Likely
2010-05-19 17:32 ` M. Warner Losh
2010-05-19 11:57 ` Grant Likely
2010-05-19 12:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-05-19 17:52 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-05-19 20:08 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-05-19 20:22 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-05-21 16:24 ` John Rigby
2010-05-21 16:27 ` Jamie Bennett
2010-05-21 19:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-03 21:12 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-04 20:01 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-04 20:33 ` John Rigby
2010-06-04 20:37 ` Jon Loeliger
2010-06-04 21:07 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-05 1:33 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-05 2:29 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-05 5:59 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-09 4:26 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-09 13:09 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-05-19 11:45 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100519120843.GB24520@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).