From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 20:46:54 +0100 Subject: [RFC PATCH v2] preliminary support for sparse IRQ In-Reply-To: <20100520082853.GA18885@linux-sh.org> References: <20100520082853.GA18885@linux-sh.org> Message-ID: <20100521194654.GH11042@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 05:28:53PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 06:34:49PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote: > > commit 2e2e087d96630c95dbce57036680cf917e906cf1 > > Author: Eric Miao > > Date: Mon Dec 28 12:59:59 2009 +0800 > > > > [ARM] preliminary support for sparse IRQ > > > > So to allow NR_IRQS to be dynamic and platforms to specify the number > > of IRQs really needed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Miao > > > It would be nice to see this applied, we plan to use sparseirq > unconditionally for shmobile (as sh already does). However, it's a little late in the day for patches for this merge window - which could be over as early as Sunday. However, if Eric wants to submit it to the patch system, I'll see about queuing it, but I can't make any promises that it'll get in.