* [PATCH] s3c24xx fix: freeze during suspend/resume on s3c24xx if some GPIO banks not present
@ 2010-05-23 4:42 Pinkava J.
2010-05-23 9:19 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-05-23 13:18 ` Pinkava J.
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pinkava J. @ 2010-05-23 4:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
When saving GPIOs during suspend/resume we need skip missing GPIO banks, not
trying get corresponding chip again and again in infinite loop.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pinkava <jiri.pinkava@vscht.cz>
---
arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c | 8 ++++++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
index d50ab9d..7df03f8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
@@ -331,8 +331,10 @@ void s3c_pm_save_gpios(void)
for (gpio_nr = 0; gpio_nr < S3C_GPIO_END;) {
ourchip = s3c_gpiolib_getchip(gpio_nr);
- if (!ourchip)
+ if (!ourchip) {
+ gpio_nr++;
continue;
+ }
s3c_pm_save_gpio(ourchip);
@@ -369,8 +371,10 @@ void s3c_pm_restore_gpios(void)
for (gpio_nr = 0; gpio_nr < S3C_GPIO_END;) {
ourchip = s3c_gpiolib_getchip(gpio_nr);
- if (!ourchip)
+ if (!ourchip) {
+ gpio_nr++;
continue;
+ }
s3c_pm_resume_gpio(ourchip);
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] s3c24xx fix: freeze during suspend/resume on s3c24xx if some GPIO banks not present
2010-05-23 4:42 [PATCH] s3c24xx fix: freeze during suspend/resume on s3c24xx if some GPIO banks not present Pinkava J.
@ 2010-05-23 9:19 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-05-23 12:34 ` Pinkava J.
2010-05-24 3:32 ` Ben Dooks
2010-05-23 13:18 ` Pinkava J.
1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2010-05-23 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hello.
Pinkava J. wrote:
> When saving GPIOs during suspend/resume we need skip missing GPIO banks, not
> trying get corresponding chip again and again in infinite loop.
I didn't see any infinite loops there -- *continue* itself leads to
incrementing 'gpio_nr', no?
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pinkava <jiri.pinkava@vscht.cz>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
> index d50ab9d..7df03f8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
> @@ -331,8 +331,10 @@ void s3c_pm_save_gpios(void)
>
> for (gpio_nr = 0; gpio_nr < S3C_GPIO_END;) {
> ourchip = s3c_gpiolib_getchip(gpio_nr);
> - if (!ourchip)
> + if (!ourchip) {
> + gpio_nr++;
> continue;
> + }
>
> s3c_pm_save_gpio(ourchip);
>
> @@ -369,8 +371,10 @@ void s3c_pm_restore_gpios(void)
>
> for (gpio_nr = 0; gpio_nr < S3C_GPIO_END;) {
> ourchip = s3c_gpiolib_getchip(gpio_nr);
> - if (!ourchip)
> + if (!ourchip) {
> + gpio_nr++;
> continue;
> + }
>
> s3c_pm_resume_gpio(ourchip);
WBR, Sergei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] s3c24xx fix: freeze during suspend/resume on s3c24xx if some GPIO banks not present
2010-05-23 9:19 ` Sergei Shtylyov
@ 2010-05-23 12:34 ` Pinkava J.
2010-05-24 7:57 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-05-24 3:32 ` Ben Dooks
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pinkava J. @ 2010-05-23 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Dne 23.5.2010 11:19, Sergei Shtylyov napsal(a):
> Hello.
>
> Pinkava J. wrote:
>
>> When saving GPIOs during suspend/resume we need skip missing GPIO banks, not
>> trying get corresponding chip again and again in infinite loop.
>
> I didn't see any infinite loops there -- *continue* itself leads to
> incrementing 'gpio_nr', no?
No, it would have to be:
for (gpio_nr = 0; gpio_nr < S3C_GPIO_END; gpio_nr++) {
...
try create simple test program for your self
/* test.c */
main()
{
int x;
for(x = 0; x < 10; /* x++ */ )
{
printf("x = %d", x);
}
}
Compile usign:
gcc test.c
Run
./a.out
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pinkava <jiri.pinkava@vscht.cz>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
>> index d50ab9d..7df03f8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
>> @@ -331,8 +331,10 @@ void s3c_pm_save_gpios(void)
>>
>> for (gpio_nr = 0; gpio_nr < S3C_GPIO_END;) {
>> ourchip = s3c_gpiolib_getchip(gpio_nr);
>> - if (!ourchip)
>> + if (!ourchip) {
>> + gpio_nr++;
>> continue;
>> + }
>>
>> s3c_pm_save_gpio(ourchip);
>>
>> @@ -369,8 +371,10 @@ void s3c_pm_restore_gpios(void)
>>
>> for (gpio_nr = 0; gpio_nr < S3C_GPIO_END;) {
>> ourchip = s3c_gpiolib_getchip(gpio_nr);
>> - if (!ourchip)
>> + if (!ourchip) {
>> + gpio_nr++;
>> continue;
>> + }
>>
>> s3c_pm_resume_gpio(ourchip);
>
> WBR, Sergei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] s3c24xx fix: freeze during suspend/resume on s3c24xx if some GPIO banks not present
2010-05-23 4:42 [PATCH] s3c24xx fix: freeze during suspend/resume on s3c24xx if some GPIO banks not present Pinkava J.
2010-05-23 9:19 ` Sergei Shtylyov
@ 2010-05-23 13:18 ` Pinkava J.
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pinkava J. @ 2010-05-23 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Dne 23.5.2010 06:42, Pinkava J. napsal(a):
> When saving GPIOs during suspend/resume we need skip missing GPIO banks, not
> trying get corresponding chip again and again in infinite loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pinkava <jiri.pinkava@vscht.cz>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
> index d50ab9d..7df03f8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
> @@ -331,8 +331,10 @@ void s3c_pm_save_gpios(void)
>
> for (gpio_nr = 0; gpio_nr < S3C_GPIO_END;) {
Note that there is in for-linus/samsung4 working version usign
for (gpio_nr = 0; gpio_nr < S3C_GPIO_END; gpio_nr++) {
but into linus kernel was introduced a bug by last commit.
> ourchip = s3c_gpiolib_getchip(gpio_nr);
> - if (!ourchip)
> + if (!ourchip) {
> + gpio_nr++;
> continue;
> + }
>
> s3c_pm_save_gpio(ourchip);
>
> @@ -369,8 +371,10 @@ void s3c_pm_restore_gpios(void)
>
> for (gpio_nr = 0; gpio_nr < S3C_GPIO_END;) {
> ourchip = s3c_gpiolib_getchip(gpio_nr);
> - if (!ourchip)
> + if (!ourchip) {
> + gpio_nr++;
> continue;
> + }
>
> s3c_pm_resume_gpio(ourchip);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] s3c24xx fix: freeze during suspend/resume on s3c24xx if some GPIO banks not present
2010-05-23 9:19 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-05-23 12:34 ` Pinkava J.
@ 2010-05-24 3:32 ` Ben Dooks
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ben Dooks @ 2010-05-24 3:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 01:19:07PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Pinkava J. wrote:
>
>> When saving GPIOs during suspend/resume we need skip missing GPIO banks, not
>> trying get corresponding chip again and again in infinite loop.
>
> I didn't see any infinite loops there -- *continue* itself leads to
> incrementing 'gpio_nr', no?
no, I made a bit of a mess playing with this patch, so this should fix
it (now applied).
Really I could do with a list of all registered s3c_gpio_chips to allow
for a more efficient implementation, but it is a bit late for that for
this merge window.
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pinkava <jiri.pinkava@vscht.cz>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
>> index d50ab9d..7df03f8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
>> @@ -331,8 +331,10 @@ void s3c_pm_save_gpios(void)
>>
>> for (gpio_nr = 0; gpio_nr < S3C_GPIO_END;) {
>> ourchip = s3c_gpiolib_getchip(gpio_nr);
>> - if (!ourchip)
>> + if (!ourchip) {
>> + gpio_nr++;
>> continue;
>> + }
>>
>> s3c_pm_save_gpio(ourchip);
>>
>> @@ -369,8 +371,10 @@ void s3c_pm_restore_gpios(void)
>>
>> for (gpio_nr = 0; gpio_nr < S3C_GPIO_END;) {
>> ourchip = s3c_gpiolib_getchip(gpio_nr);
>> - if (!ourchip)
>> + if (!ourchip) {
>> + gpio_nr++;
>> continue;
>> + }
>>
>> s3c_pm_resume_gpio(ourchip);
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
--
Ben
Q: What's a light-year?
A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] s3c24xx fix: freeze during suspend/resume on s3c24xx if some GPIO banks not present
2010-05-23 12:34 ` Pinkava J.
@ 2010-05-24 7:57 ` Sergei Shtylyov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2010-05-24 7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hello.
Pinkava J. wrote:
>>> When saving GPIOs during suspend/resume we need skip missing GPIO banks, not
>>> trying get corresponding chip again and again in infinite loop.
>> I didn't see any infinite loops there -- *continue* itself leads to
>> incrementing 'gpio_nr', no?
> No, it would have to be:
> for (gpio_nr = 0; gpio_nr < S3C_GPIO_END; gpio_nr++) {
> ...
> try create simple test program for your self
> /* test.c */
> main()
> {
> int x;
> for(x = 0; x < 10; /* x++ */ )
> {
> printf("x = %d", x);
> }
> }
> Compile usign:
> gcc test.c
> Run
> ./a.out
Ah, I missed the empty 3rd expression in *for*, sorry. :-<
Strange loop though...
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pinkava <jiri.pinkava@vscht.cz>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c | 8 ++++++--
>>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
>>> index d50ab9d..7df03f8 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/pm-gpio.c
>>> @@ -331,8 +331,10 @@ void s3c_pm_save_gpios(void)
>>>
>>> for (gpio_nr = 0; gpio_nr < S3C_GPIO_END;) {
>>> ourchip = s3c_gpiolib_getchip(gpio_nr);
>>> - if (!ourchip)
>>> + if (!ourchip) {
>>> + gpio_nr++;
>>> continue;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> s3c_pm_save_gpio(ourchip);
>>>
>>> @@ -369,8 +371,10 @@ void s3c_pm_restore_gpios(void)
>>>
>>> for (gpio_nr = 0; gpio_nr < S3C_GPIO_END;) {
>>> ourchip = s3c_gpiolib_getchip(gpio_nr);
>>> - if (!ourchip)
>>> + if (!ourchip) {
>>> + gpio_nr++;
>>> continue;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> s3c_pm_resume_gpio(ourchip);
WBR, Sergei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-24 7:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-23 4:42 [PATCH] s3c24xx fix: freeze during suspend/resume on s3c24xx if some GPIO banks not present Pinkava J.
2010-05-23 9:19 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-05-23 12:34 ` Pinkava J.
2010-05-24 7:57 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-05-24 3:32 ` Ben Dooks
2010-05-23 13:18 ` Pinkava J.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).