From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] Initial attempt to make ARM use LMB
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 08:50:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100526075059.GA25435@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100526004418.GM9645@atomide.com>
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:44:18PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > So, below is a patch to sanitize the code in arch/arm/plat-omap/fb.c.
> > The logic in this file is rather convoluted, but essentially:
>
> I've tried the patch below with the patches from your lmb branch
> up to this one and I can see tux on my osk5912 and n900:
>
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Interesting patch name!
> After applying the next patch in your lmb branch "ARM: OMAP: Convert
> to use ->reserve method to reserve boot time memory" tux still works
> on 5912osk, but not on n900. The difference is that osk5912 uses
> the old omapfb code.
I guess this is because I don't have board-n900.c in my tree. All OMAP
boards need a ".reserve = omap_reserve," line added in their machine
descriptor.
I just noticed that board-n8x0.c contains more than one machine descriptor,
which I've now fixed up.
> Then, looks like reordering of the patches now causes patch
> "ARM: initial LMB trial" to fail with:
>
> arch/arm/mm/init.c:301: error: conflicting types for 'bootmem_init'
> arch/arm/mm/mm.h:32: error: previous declaration of 'bootmem_init' was here
> arch/arm/mm/init.c: In function 'bootmem_init':
> arch/arm/mm/init.c:312: error: 'mdesc' undeclared (first use in this function)
> arch/arm/mm/init.c:312: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> arch/arm/mm/init.c:312: error: for each function it appears in.)
> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mm/init.o] Error 1
Now fixed, thanks.
> Also, the last patch in lmb branch "ARM: use LMB to allocate system
> memory MMIO resource structures" causes both osk5912 and n900
> to hang very early. Maybe I'm missing some patch again..
Hmm, I'll take a look later today.
> Anyways, I've picked the patches from lmb branch up to the one below
> into omap-testing. Will add more of them once we get them working.
You should now be able to pick all but the last patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-26 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-25 23:32 [RFC] Initial attempt to make ARM use LMB Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-31 6:43 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-04-01 9:47 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-04-09 11:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-04-08 15:32 ` Rabin Vincent
2010-04-08 18:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-04-09 11:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-04-10 3:42 ` Rabin Vincent
2010-04-10 7:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-04-10 11:56 ` Rabin Vincent
2010-04-14 7:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-05-05 15:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-13 17:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-13 21:19 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-05-13 21:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-13 22:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-05-13 22:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-14 7:24 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-05-14 10:11 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2010-05-14 10:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-17 9:38 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2010-05-17 9:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-17 10:26 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2010-05-17 17:37 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-05-18 7:47 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2010-05-18 8:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-18 8:58 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2010-05-14 15:22 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-05-14 15:32 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-05-14 15:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-05-22 21:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-26 0:44 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-05-26 7:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-05-26 13:51 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-05-26 21:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-27 8:52 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2010-05-27 9:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-27 9:47 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2010-05-28 14:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-31 8:04 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100526075059.GA25435@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).