From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hjk@linutronix.de (Hans J. Koch) Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 19:28:52 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/7 v5] Introduce plat-tcc In-Reply-To: <20100422111007.GD20008@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20100421123814.GC1995@bluebox.local> <20100421124046.GD1995@bluebox.local> <20100422111007.GD20008@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20100526172851.GA2006@bluebox.local> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:10:07PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 02:40:48PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote: > > +#define UART_RBR_OFFS 0x00 > > +#define UART_THR_OFFS 0x00 > > +#define UART_DLL_OFFS 0x00 > > +#define UART_IER_OFFS 0x04 > > +#define UART_DLM_OFFS 0x04 > > +#define UART_IIR_OFFS 0x08 > > +#define UART_FCR_OFFS 0x08 > > +#define UART_LCR_OFFS 0x0c > > +#define UART_MCR_OFFS 0x10 > > +#define UART_LSR_OFFS 0x14 > > +#define UART_MSR_OFFS 0x18 > > +#define UART_SCR_OFFS 0x1c > > These look like a duplication (n << 2) of the standard 8250 definitions > in serial_reg.h Yep. Meanwhile I've got confirmation from Telechips that this is actually supposed to be a 8250-compatible thing. I will use that driver in the future, so for the moment, I threw away all UART-related stuff. Thanks for that hint! > > > +/* Bits in UART_LCR */ > > +#define UART_LCR_DLAB (1 << 7) > > +#define UART_LCR_SB (1 << 6) > > +#define UART_LCR_SP (1 << 5) > > +#define UART_LCR_EPS (1 << 4) > > +#define UART_LCR_PEN (1 << 3) > > +#define UART_LCR_STB (1 << 2) > > +#define UART_LCR_WLS_5 (0 << 0) > > +#define UART_LCR_WLS_6 (1 << 0) > > +#define UART_LCR_WLS_7 (2 << 0) > > +#define UART_LCR_WLS_8 (3 << 0) > > #define UART_LCR_DLAB 0x80 /* Divisor latch access bit */ > #define UART_LCR_SBC 0x40 /* Set break control */ > #define UART_LCR_SPAR 0x20 /* Stick parity (?) */ > #define UART_LCR_EPAR 0x10 /* Even parity select */ > #define UART_LCR_PARITY 0x08 /* Parity Enable */ > #define UART_LCR_STOP 0x04 /* Stop bits: 0=1 bit, 1=2 bits */ > #define UART_LCR_WLEN5 0x00 /* Wordlength: 5 bits */ > #define UART_LCR_WLEN6 0x01 /* Wordlength: 6 bits */ > #define UART_LCR_WLEN7 0x02 /* Wordlength: 7 bits */ > #define UART_LCR_WLEN8 0x03 /* Wordlength: 8 bits */ > > etc. Please use the already established definitions from linux/serial_reg.h I've done so in uncompress.h (the only remaining user). > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-tcc/system.c b/arch/arm/plat-tcc/system.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..79b6ecd > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-tcc/system.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ > > +/* > > + * System functions for Telechips TCCxxxx SoCs > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) Hans J. Koch > > + * > > + * Licensed under the terms of the GPL v2. > > + * > > + */ > > + > > +#include > > + > > +#include > > + > > +/* System reboot */ > > +void plat_tcc_reboot(void) > > +{ > > + /* Make sure clocks are on */ > > + __raw_writel(0xffffffff, CKC_BASE + BCLKCTR0_OFFS); > > + > > + /* Enable watchdog reset */ > > + __raw_writel(0x49, TIMER_BASE + TWDCFG_OFFS); > > + /* Wait for reset */ > > + unreachable(); > > I don't think that's true; what you're saying is that the CPU will never > execute any instructions after the __raw_writel - what if the write is > buffered and doesn't take effect immediately - are you happy for the CPU > to start executing data? Grmbl... The meaning of unreachable() has changed. OK, I replaced it with a while(1); New patch series will follow. Thanks, Hans