From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 23:01:12 +0200 Subject: Controlling Driver Load Order In-Reply-To: References: <20100526235246.GA31068@pengutronix.de> <20100527041358.GA14070@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20100527210112.GA5636@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > Anyway, I better understand the subsys_initcall now and applied that > to the i2c-gpio and my i2c chip driver. That worked perfectly for my With chip-driver you mean the PMIC? Yes, that is probably needed there, too. Which driver is it? > issue. I'd be happy to return a patch of this. Would be this the > sort of thing that would benefit from a config option? Something Nope, there is no bigger drawback to this and probably a number of useres wouldn't know what to select here. Just patch the module_init() away. Kind regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: