From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 00:09:51 +0200 Subject: Controlling Driver Load Order In-Reply-To: <4BFEEA08.70401@bluewatersys.com> References: <20100526235246.GA31068@pengutronix.de> <20100527041358.GA14070@pengutronix.de> <4BFEDF6D.3090100@bluewatersys.com> <20100527214209.GC5636@pengutronix.de> <4BFEEA08.70401@bluewatersys.com> Message-ID: <20100527220951.GD5636@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > Always ask which kernel is used, sigh... > > Sorry? I didn't see a kernel version mentioned. I went looking because I > had though that i2c-gpio was already subsys_initcall. Sorry, I missed emphasizing that my comment was meant as a "note-to-myself". You were perfectly right, of course, I should have done the same. > >> There was a discussion a while back to make all of the embedded i2c > >> busses be subsys_initcall since i2c is often a system bus on embedded > > > > Oh, where was that? Can't recall (but couldn't recall that I acked the i2c-gpio > > patch above as well ;)) > > > > Moving the embedded i2c busses to subsys_initcall was discussed here: > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/i2c/2008-June/004142.html. The > i2c_gpio bus got mentioned, which is why I thought it had already been > changed. Thanks for the pointer! -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: