linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ben-linux@fluff.org (Ben Dooks)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: defining ARM machine type properly
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 02:08:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100528010851.GN4720@trinity.fluff.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BFE8AF3.4060304@gmail.com>

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:08:35AM -0400, f. achkar wrote:
> On 05/26/2010 09:07 PM, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 05:11:22PM -0400, f. achkar wrote:
> >   
> >> hi,
> >> I'm trying to port smdk2450 arch to the a new kernel 2.6.32-9, I did the
> >>     
> > I suspect what you are doing is trying to port it to a machine that
> > was loosley based on the SMDK2450 and that whoever did the uboot port
> > failed to understand that when the hardware changes then the machine
> > number needs to change too.
> >
> >   
> >> initial work as per various googled documents, but somehow the current
> >> initial Image is failing at arch/arm/kernel/head-common.S :
> >> '__lookup_processor_type', and eventually goes to '__error_a' of the
> >> same file! this seems to be related to the definition of machine_type as
> >> defined in :
> >> include/asm-arm/mach-types.h  and arch/arm/tools/mach-types*
> >> I checked where the definition goes in  include/asm-arm/mach-types.h by
> >> inserting
> >>     
> > you probably wanted to enable the debugging in the head code.
> >
> >   
> >> #error 2223XX
> >> into various parts of that header and seems fine at the point.
> >> nevertheless I'm not 100 sure
> >> I wonder if the is a definitive reference to guide in this matter,
> >> better yet a check-list like procedure??
> >> thanks,
> >> ferar
> >>     
> > How about downloading the latest kernel, with nice fresh S3C2450 support
> > in it?
> >   
> which version is that? 2.6.34 does not contain such support!
> thanks

2.6.34-git

core support is in, hopefully core peripheral support can be sorted out
and released as soon as possible.

-- 
Ben

Q:      What's a light-year?
A:      One-third less calories than a regular year.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-28  1:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-26 21:11 defining ARM machine type properly f. achkar
2010-05-27  1:07 ` Ben Dooks
2010-05-27 14:29   ` f. achkar
2010-05-27 15:08   ` f. achkar
2010-05-28  1:08     ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2010-05-27  3:14 ` Wan ZongShun
2010-05-27 14:53   ` f. achkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100528010851.GN4720@trinity.fluff.org \
    --to=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).