From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com (Haavard Skinnemoen) Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 11:42:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] atmel_serial: Atmel RS485 support v2 In-Reply-To: <4BFE41FD.2080804@atmel.com> References: <4BB053C4.7050700@evidence.eu.com> <4BB10304.6090006@bluewatersys.com> <4BB1BF49.2000609@evidence.eu.com> <4BB252E3.3030703@bluewatersys.com> <4BBD8C9D.3070401@evidence.eu.com> <20100408111310.524f7354@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <4BBDD71D.1010700@evidence.eu.com> <4BFD1FB6.8050405@atmel.com> <4BFE2F38.8050200@evidence.eu.com> <4BFE41FD.2080804@atmel.com> Message-ID: <20100528114245.3d030692@hskinnemoen-d830> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > (the maintainer of the driver never answered to emails...). > > I was supposed to take over its maintainance one year ago but did not > find time to do it. My fault here also... My fault too...I should really try harder to respond to e-mails. I was planning to give it a spin and send it upstream, but I never found the time. Nicolas, is it ok if I send a patch to update MAINTAINERS? That way, you'll receive these patches and questions about them by e-mail rather than me. Haavard