Heads up: Linus plans to kill ARM defconfigs

[marek.vasut@gmail.com (Marek Vasut)]

Dne P? 4. ?ervna 2010 03:35:28 Eric Miao napsal(a):
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Ryan Mallon <ryan@bluewatersys.com> wrote:
> > Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> Dne P? 4. ?ervna 2010 01:33:35 Ryan Mallon napsal(a):
> >>> Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Ryan Mallon wrote:
> >>>>> Is it worth being a bit proactive and getting rid of some of them in
> >>>>> advance? Things like spear3[012]0_defconfig are basically identically
> >>>>> except for the board type. Combining all three of those would remove
> >>>>> 1500 lines of code.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Please go ahead with a patch.
> >>> 
> >>> Hmm, not as easy as I thought. The three boards cannot be built into a
> >>> single kernel since the arch/arm/mach-spear3xx/spear3[012]0.c files all
> >>> extern a bunch of structs which have naming conflicts.
> >>> 
> >>> It does look possible to rewrite that code so that all three boards can
> >>> be built into a single kernel. I can try and put together a patch, but
> >>> I don't have any hardware to test with.
> >>> 
> >>> The at91 is actually in a similar state, where only one of the
> >>> at91sam9260, at91sam9g45, etc can be selected. Again, it should be
> >>> possible to rework the code so that most of the different cpus can be
> >>> built into a single kernel. I'm sure other mach's are in a simliar
> >>> state. Fixing these where possible would allow us to have single
> >>> defconfigs per mach directory and reduce code churn, which is what
> >>> Linus is really complaining about.
> >> 
> >> I just tested, PXA (mach-pxa) probably can be compiled into single
> >> kernel supporting all the boards.
> > 
> > Yes, IIRC Russell and Eric did a huge amount of work to get pxa into
> > that state.
> > 
> > ryan at okiwi:configs$ grep "ARCH_PXA=y" * | wc -l
> > 25
> > 
> > Can we remove/combine some of those?
> 
> Definitely. In the end of the day, I would like to see pxa_defconfig only.
> But at the moment, I need every board maintainer to review their defconfig
> and combine them as much as possible. E.g.
> 
> palmte_defconfig   palmtt_defconfig   palmz71_defconfig  palmz72_defconfig

This is OMAP stuff, not PXA. But yeah, these could be combined. I don't have 
these devices available at the moment (and it might be a problem getting them 
into operational state).
> 
> I'd guess can simply combine into one. (Marek, feel free to do it)
> 
> I'd more like a step to step work instead of a brutely removal of all
> defconfig, not sure if Linus is going to buy in.
> 
> For those sub-arch which cannot simply compile a single kernel for multiple
> boards, s5p* as previously mentioned, I suggest not to introduce any new
> defconfig until the problem is solved.
> 
> Also, we are now working on a single kernel for multiple sub-arch (at least
> what Nicolas and I am doing now, and welcome to join us). It's tough (the
> way to handle different phys_offset is only the tip of the iceberg) and
> seems now more and more necessary. so hopefully by the end of the day, we
> may possible end up with only very few defconfig.

How long is your day now ?