From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Heads up: Linus plans to kill ARM defconfigs
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:31:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100608123102.GT15515@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100608115832.GB25370@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [100608 14:53]:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 04:51:24PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > Linus wants something to be done about the current defconfig mess which
> > is perfectly legitimate. He even suggested a possible solution. I
> > don't think he'll simply drop those defconfig files if we demonstrate
> > that we're taking action to fix the actual problem.
>
> However, having a set of patches which combine a load of defconfig
> files into one is not going to solve the problem.
>
> If you're hypothesis that Linus is only looking at the diffstat, then
> what are patches to combine the defconfigs going to do? It's going
> to create lots of noise in arch/arm/configs/ - which is precisely what
> Linus is complaining about. In fact, patch-wise it's going to create
> an extremely large patch. And if we do this time and time again while
> progressively reducing the defconfigs. No, this isn't the answer -
> it's only going to make the problem worse.
>
> I believe the only acceptable solution is to get an alterative method
> in place - no matter what it is - and remove the all but one of the
> defconfig files from the mainline kernel. _And_, most importantly,
> kautobuild needs to be fixed so that we still get build coverage.
>
> The loss of kautobuild is a major concern here, and I believe it trumps
> everything else for the next merge window. Kautobuild is an extremely
> important resource that we simply can not afford to lose.
How about the following strategy for the next merge window:
- Update kautobuild to temporarily host the current defconfigs
- Remove all the arm defconfigs except one
Then over the next few merge cycles:
- Make the ARM platform specific Kconfig or similar option to work
- Drop the old defconfigs from kautobuild once we have the new solution
Then over yet unknown lenght of time:
- Work towards building in more features (TLS/SMP/VFPvX) into the same kernel
- Work towards building in multiple ARM platforms into the same kernel
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-08 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-03 19:24 Heads up: Linus plans to kill ARM defconfigs Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-03 19:55 ` Marek Vasut
2010-06-03 20:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-03 20:27 ` Marek Vasut
2010-06-03 20:38 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-08 14:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-03 23:46 ` Daniel Walker
2010-06-04 11:06 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-03 19:59 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-03 20:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-03 20:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-03 21:04 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-03 22:31 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-03 23:33 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-03 23:45 ` Kyungmin Park
2010-06-04 0:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-04 1:10 ` Marek Vasut
2010-06-04 1:16 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-04 1:35 ` Eric Miao
2010-06-04 1:37 ` Marek Vasut
2010-06-04 1:50 ` Marek Vasut
2010-06-04 1:53 ` Marek Vasut
2010-06-04 6:03 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-06-04 14:59 ` Cory Maccarrone
2010-06-07 7:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-06-04 1:57 ` Eric Miao
2010-06-04 6:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-06-04 7:12 ` Eric Miao
2010-06-04 8:40 ` Martin Guy
2010-06-04 20:51 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-04 22:08 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-06-08 11:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-08 12:31 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2010-06-08 12:43 ` Eric Miao
2010-06-08 12:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-08 13:00 ` Eric Miao
2010-06-08 12:43 ` David John
2010-06-08 12:44 ` Eric Miao
2010-06-08 12:50 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-08 12:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-08 12:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-08 13:01 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-08 13:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-08 14:51 ` Eric Miao
2010-06-08 16:55 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-08 23:23 ` Daniel Walker
2010-06-08 12:50 ` Christer Weinigel
2010-06-08 13:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-08 20:51 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-08 21:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-08 21:32 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-08 23:02 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-08 23:21 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-08 23:26 ` Daniel Walker
2010-06-08 23:31 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-08 23:52 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-09 0:14 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-09 6:07 ` Hendrik Sattler
2010-06-09 13:32 ` Daniel Walker
2010-06-10 6:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-10 19:18 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-09 21:56 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-25 12:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-06-07 21:09 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-04 10:42 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-06-04 8:36 ` pieterg
[not found] ` <AANLkTilyIb8WDAanNHlQKHco6rSjzNjNS9Q3TpWQqt8o@mail.gmail.com>
2010-06-04 8:42 ` Eric Miao
2010-06-04 8:56 ` Daniel Mack
2010-06-04 9:37 ` pieterg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100608123102.GT15515@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).