From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:50:53 +0100
Subject: Heads up: Linus plans to kill ARM defconfigs
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1006080839240.30664@xanadu.home>
References: <4C083BCF.2060500@bluewatersys.com>
	<201006040310.15019.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
	<4C0853E1.1080005@bluewatersys.com>
	<AANLkTinEq99_8UyVNnmzNEreDoyHKEnxpuJmaAo_kpPN@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100604061034.GI6499@atomide.com>
	<AANLkTikrK-RkDntgrpptBaG6TvnesNFncOw3DW4Jt-TY@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTil1IetX6koHVRrgnWs3DqhPtZVqR2euEdg9lZUa@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1006041418390.22319@xanadu.home>
	<20100608115832.GB25370@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1006080839240.30664@xanadu.home>
Message-ID: <20100608125053.GD25370@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 08:44:52AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > I believe the only acceptable solution is to get an alterative method
> > in place - no matter what it is - and remove the all but one of the
> > defconfig files from the mainline kernel.  _And_, most importantly,
> > kautobuild needs to be fixed so that we still get build coverage.
> 
> I personally think that your suggestion using STD_CONFIG or similar is a 
> good way forward.  Specific needs for given targets can then be 
> expressed along with the Kconfig menu item describing that target.

It would've been nice, but Linus appears to have ruled that option out too.