From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:25:59 +0100
Subject: Request review of device tree documentation
In-Reply-To: <4C15DE2E.1050905@firmworks.com>
References: <1276339529.1962.184.camel@pasglop>
	<1276339684.1962.186.camel@pasglop>
	<4C13B618.1030006@firmworks.com>
	<1276383132.1962.195.camel@pasglop>
	<AANLkTimRV8u3gDNCAIlROJoPcKs7jFwj2na3ZDFOg3O0@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C146F18.9030008@firmworks.com>
	<1276408773.1962.574.camel@pasglop>
	<AANLkTinwL0XtMNG13inr_1UliOlqZkyr4dlvG-ZGL9JT@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100614073828.GA6095@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<4C15DE2E.1050905@firmworks.com>
Message-ID: <20100614092559.GA7881@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 09:45:50PM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> None of this is a deal-breaker for the kind of debugging tasks that are  
> the primary use case for the callback.

Would you mind explaining what kind of tasks these callbacks will
be used for?