From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:20:02 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] OMAP: PM: initial runtime PM core support In-Reply-To: References: <1277422991-25350-1-git-send-email-khilman@deeprootsystems.com> <1277422991-25350-2-git-send-email-khilman@deeprootsystems.com> <20100625200659.GB22090@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20100625202002.GC22090@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:13:15PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 09:26:43AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > >> This approach is also not multiplatform friendly (cc'ing Eric and > >> Nicolas who are working on ARM multiplatform). ?It won't work for > >> building a kernel that supports, say, both versatile and OMAP. > > > > And I should also point out that multiplatform is not the answer to > > Linus' concerns. ?There's no way such work is going to be anywhere > > near complete come the next merge window. > > Yes, but solving the defconfig problem isn't the reason for multiplatform. Does anyone know where we are on the defconfig problem? From what I can see, it's mostly stalled for the time being, which is not good news for us.