From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [patch 2/2] arm: Implement l2x0 cache disable function
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 18:21:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100702172134.GA2978@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1278087010.10162.271.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 05:10:10PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 16:29 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > True, but that's an implementation detail. What's more important is to
> > make a decision how to solve the problem as kexec is completely
> > unusable for all L2 systems right now.
>
> My view is that we should try to find why cache flushing doesn't work
> but unfortunately I don't have any spare time to look into this (would
> need to use tools like ICE debugging/tracing).
It's quite simple. If you leave the L2 cache enabled, then the
decompressor needs to have L2 cache support in it, since it re-enables
the cache. We really don't want to go down that route.
Moreover, boot loaders will not expect L2 cache to be enabled when we
re-enter them for soft-reboot via their reset vector.
So, I agree with Thomas - we have to preserve the already stated
requirements in the kernel booting document(s) which stipulate that
caches must be disabled when the kernel is called.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-02 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-01 16:05 [patch 0/2] ARM: Disable outer cache before kexec call Thomas Gleixner
2010-07-01 16:05 ` [patch 1/2] arm: Disable outer (L2) cache in kexec Thomas Gleixner
2010-07-01 16:05 ` [patch 2/2] arm: Implement l2x0 cache disable function Thomas Gleixner
[not found] ` <AANLkTillHUsJF8brOtHh8tl9Us493GsWfpjhXXsFExY7@mail.gmail.com>
2010-07-02 11:23 ` srinidhi
2010-07-02 11:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-07-02 15:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-07-02 16:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-07-02 16:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-07-02 16:51 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-07-02 16:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-07-02 17:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-03 7:01 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-07-04 14:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-07-04 15:31 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-07-04 19:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-05 9:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-07-02 17:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-07-02 16:48 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-07-01 16:14 ` [patch 0/2] ARM: Disable outer cache before kexec call Catalin Marinas
2010-07-01 16:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-07-01 16:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-07-01 16:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-07-01 17:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-07-02 10:58 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-07-01 16:38 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-07-01 16:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-07-01 16:44 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-07-01 17:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-01 17:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-01 17:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-07-01 17:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-01 20:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100702172134.GA2978@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).