* [patch 0/2] [patch 0/2] ARM: Disable outer cache before kexec call -V2 @ 2010-07-05 9:25 Thomas Gleixner 2010-07-05 9:25 ` [patch 1/2] arm: Disable outer (L2) cache in kexec Thomas Gleixner 2010-07-05 9:25 ` [patch 2/2] arm: Implement l2x0 cache disable functions Thomas Gleixner 0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2010-07-05 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel The following patch series addresses the problem, that the kexec code does not disable the outer cache before disabling the inner cache and jumping into the new kernel. This results in random crashes of the new kernel. Changes since version 1: - added flush_all() and inv_all() functions to outer_cache_fns so OMAP can override the disable() function easily. - changed the implementation from inv_all() -> disable() to flush_all() -> disable() -> inv_all() according to feedback from Russell and Catalin. Thanks, tglx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [patch 1/2] arm: Disable outer (L2) cache in kexec 2010-07-05 9:25 [patch 0/2] [patch 0/2] ARM: Disable outer cache before kexec call -V2 Thomas Gleixner @ 2010-07-05 9:25 ` Thomas Gleixner 2010-07-05 10:52 ` Catalin Marinas 2010-07-05 9:25 ` [patch 2/2] arm: Implement l2x0 cache disable functions Thomas Gleixner 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2010-07-05 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: arm-outer-cache-disable-for-kexec.patch URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20100705/76e5d455/attachment.ksh> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [patch 1/2] arm: Disable outer (L2) cache in kexec 2010-07-05 9:25 ` [patch 1/2] arm: Disable outer (L2) cache in kexec Thomas Gleixner @ 2010-07-05 10:52 ` Catalin Marinas 2010-07-05 11:13 ` Thomas Gleixner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Catalin Marinas @ 2010-07-05 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 10:25 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > kexec does not disable the outer cache before disabling the inner > caches in cpu_proc_fin(). So L2 is enabled across the kexec jump. When > the new kernel enables chaches again, it randomly crashes. > > Disabling L2 before calling cpu_proc_fin() cures the problem. > > Disabling L2 requires the following new functions: flush_all(), > inv_all() and disable(). Add them to outer_cache_fns and call them > from the kexec code. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > Index: linux-2.6/arch/arm/include/asm/outercache.h > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/include/asm/outercache.h > +++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/include/asm/outercache.h > @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ struct outer_cache_fns { > void (*inv_range)(unsigned long, unsigned long); > void (*clean_range)(unsigned long, unsigned long); > void (*flush_range)(unsigned long, unsigned long); > + void (*flush_all)(void); > + void (*inv_all)(void); > + void (*disable)(void); Why don't we handle the flush_all/inv_all in the disable function and avoid exporting them? Once exported, people may start using them in drivers and they should use the DMA API for this. The inv_all is also dangerous if called when the L2 is enabled. > +static inline void outer_cache_disable(void) > +{ > + if (outer_cache.disable) > + outer_cache.disable(); > +} Personal preference - "outer_disable()" as we don't call any of the other functions outer_cache_*(). > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c > +++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c > @@ -74,7 +74,10 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *image) > (unsigned long) reboot_code_buffer + KEXEC_CONTROL_PAGE_SIZE); > printk(KERN_INFO "Bye!\n"); > > + outer_flush_all(); > + outer_cache_disable(); > cpu_proc_fin(); > + outer_inv_all(); As I said above, we could have just outer_disable() here which does outer_flush_all, disabling and outer_inv_all. I don't think the invalidation needs to be done after cup_proc_fin(). Thanks. -- Catalin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [patch 1/2] arm: Disable outer (L2) cache in kexec 2010-07-05 10:52 ` Catalin Marinas @ 2010-07-05 11:13 ` Thomas Gleixner 2010-07-05 11:16 ` Catalin Marinas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2010-07-05 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 10:25 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > kexec does not disable the outer cache before disabling the inner > > caches in cpu_proc_fin(). So L2 is enabled across the kexec jump. When > > the new kernel enables chaches again, it randomly crashes. > > > > Disabling L2 before calling cpu_proc_fin() cures the problem. > > > > Disabling L2 requires the following new functions: flush_all(), > > inv_all() and disable(). Add them to outer_cache_fns and call them > > from the kexec code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > > Index: linux-2.6/arch/arm/include/asm/outercache.h > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/include/asm/outercache.h > > +++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/include/asm/outercache.h > > @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ struct outer_cache_fns { > > void (*inv_range)(unsigned long, unsigned long); > > void (*clean_range)(unsigned long, unsigned long); > > void (*flush_range)(unsigned long, unsigned long); > > + void (*flush_all)(void); > > + void (*inv_all)(void); > > + void (*disable)(void); > > Why don't we handle the flush_all/inv_all in the disable function and > avoid exporting them? Once exported, people may start using them in Because OMAP needs them to avoid reimplementing everything in the OMAP part. So OMAP only needs to override the disable function. And if Russell wants to add his cleanup patch which he posted last week, then the split and the export needs to be done anyway. Thanks, tglx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [patch 1/2] arm: Disable outer (L2) cache in kexec 2010-07-05 11:13 ` Thomas Gleixner @ 2010-07-05 11:16 ` Catalin Marinas 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Catalin Marinas @ 2010-07-05 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 12:13 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 10:25 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > kexec does not disable the outer cache before disabling the inner > > > caches in cpu_proc_fin(). So L2 is enabled across the kexec jump. When > > > the new kernel enables chaches again, it randomly crashes. > > > > > > Disabling L2 before calling cpu_proc_fin() cures the problem. > > > > > > Disabling L2 requires the following new functions: flush_all(), > > > inv_all() and disable(). Add them to outer_cache_fns and call them > > > from the kexec code. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > > > Index: linux-2.6/arch/arm/include/asm/outercache.h > > > =================================================================== > > > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/include/asm/outercache.h > > > +++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/include/asm/outercache.h > > > @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ struct outer_cache_fns { > > > void (*inv_range)(unsigned long, unsigned long); > > > void (*clean_range)(unsigned long, unsigned long); > > > void (*flush_range)(unsigned long, unsigned long); > > > + void (*flush_all)(void); > > > + void (*inv_all)(void); > > > + void (*disable)(void); > > > > Why don't we handle the flush_all/inv_all in the disable function and > > avoid exporting them? Once exported, people may start using them in > > Because OMAP needs them to avoid reimplementing everything in the OMAP > part. So OMAP only needs to override the disable function. And if > Russell wants to add his cleanup patch which he posted last week, then > the split and the export needs to be done anyway. OK, good point. Thanks. -- Catalin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [patch 2/2] arm: Implement l2x0 cache disable functions 2010-07-05 9:25 [patch 0/2] [patch 0/2] ARM: Disable outer cache before kexec call -V2 Thomas Gleixner 2010-07-05 9:25 ` [patch 1/2] arm: Disable outer (L2) cache in kexec Thomas Gleixner @ 2010-07-05 9:25 ` Thomas Gleixner 2010-07-05 10:54 ` Catalin Marinas 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2010-07-05 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: arm-l2x0-cache-disable.patch URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20100705/e4216032/attachment.ksh> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [patch 2/2] arm: Implement l2x0 cache disable functions 2010-07-05 9:25 ` [patch 2/2] arm: Implement l2x0 cache disable functions Thomas Gleixner @ 2010-07-05 10:54 ` Catalin Marinas 2010-07-05 11:10 ` Thomas Gleixner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Catalin Marinas @ 2010-07-05 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 10:25 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c > +++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c > @@ -103,7 +103,19 @@ static void l2x0_cache_sync(void) > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l2x0_lock, flags); > } > > -static inline void l2x0_inv_all(void) > +static void l2x0_flush_all(void) > +{ > + unsigned long flags; > + > + /* clean all ways */ > + spin_lock_irqsave(&l2x0_lock, flags); > + writel(l2x0_way_mask, l2x0_base + L2X0_CLEAN_WAY); > + cache_wait(l2x0_base + L2X0_CLEAN_WAY, l2x0_way_mask); > + cache_sync(); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l2x0_lock, flags); > +} Since it only does cleaning, we should probably call it l2x0_clean_all (the same for the outer_cache_fns entry). I think on ARM we traditionally referred to flush as clean+invalidate. -- Catalin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [patch 2/2] arm: Implement l2x0 cache disable functions 2010-07-05 10:54 ` Catalin Marinas @ 2010-07-05 11:10 ` Thomas Gleixner 2010-07-05 11:14 ` Catalin Marinas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2010-07-05 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 10:25 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c > > +++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c > > @@ -103,7 +103,19 @@ static void l2x0_cache_sync(void) > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l2x0_lock, flags); > > } > > > > -static inline void l2x0_inv_all(void) > > +static void l2x0_flush_all(void) > > +{ > > + unsigned long flags; > > + > > + /* clean all ways */ > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&l2x0_lock, flags); > > + writel(l2x0_way_mask, l2x0_base + L2X0_CLEAN_WAY); > > + cache_wait(l2x0_base + L2X0_CLEAN_WAY, l2x0_way_mask); > > + cache_sync(); > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l2x0_lock, flags); > > +} > > Since it only does cleaning, we should probably call it l2x0_clean_all > (the same for the outer_cache_fns entry). I think on ARM we > traditionally referred to flush as clean+invalidate. So CLEAN_INV_WAY is the right opcode ? Thanks, tglx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [patch 2/2] arm: Implement l2x0 cache disable functions 2010-07-05 11:10 ` Thomas Gleixner @ 2010-07-05 11:14 ` Catalin Marinas 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Catalin Marinas @ 2010-07-05 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 12:10 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 10:25 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c > > > +++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c > > > @@ -103,7 +103,19 @@ static void l2x0_cache_sync(void) > > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l2x0_lock, flags); > > > } > > > > > > -static inline void l2x0_inv_all(void) > > > +static void l2x0_flush_all(void) > > > +{ > > > + unsigned long flags; > > > + > > > + /* clean all ways */ > > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&l2x0_lock, flags); > > > + writel(l2x0_way_mask, l2x0_base + L2X0_CLEAN_WAY); > > > + cache_wait(l2x0_base + L2X0_CLEAN_WAY, l2x0_way_mask); > > > + cache_sync(); > > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l2x0_lock, flags); > > > +} > > > > Since it only does cleaning, we should probably call it l2x0_clean_all > > (the same for the outer_cache_fns entry). I think on ARM we > > traditionally referred to flush as clean+invalidate. > > So CLEAN_INV_WAY is the right opcode ? Yes. -- Catalin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-05 11:16 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-07-05 9:25 [patch 0/2] [patch 0/2] ARM: Disable outer cache before kexec call -V2 Thomas Gleixner 2010-07-05 9:25 ` [patch 1/2] arm: Disable outer (L2) cache in kexec Thomas Gleixner 2010-07-05 10:52 ` Catalin Marinas 2010-07-05 11:13 ` Thomas Gleixner 2010-07-05 11:16 ` Catalin Marinas 2010-07-05 9:25 ` [patch 2/2] arm: Implement l2x0 cache disable functions Thomas Gleixner 2010-07-05 10:54 ` Catalin Marinas 2010-07-05 11:10 ` Thomas Gleixner 2010-07-05 11:14 ` Catalin Marinas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).