From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: r.schwebel@pengutronix.de (Robert Schwebel) Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 15:23:39 +0200 Subject: Some benchmarks on ARM In-Reply-To: <4C31D861.607@gmail.com> References: <20100702180257.GA8767@pengutronix.de> <4C31D861.607@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100705132339.GY20855@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Maurus, On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 03:04:33PM +0200, Maurus Cuelenaere wrote: > Some quick tests of lmbench on a Sheevaplug: Thanks a lot - we'll update the document soon, wiht the exact command lines included. > I'm not sure if I'm doing this right, but it looks like the Sheevaplug > beats all ARM chips (except on FP) on the tests done at [1]. Looks > like these tests heavily depend on the clock frequency. If anyone has an idea for better benchmarks, I'd be very interested. We have been searching for benchmarks which: - can be easily cross compiled to all involved platforms - show the different aspects of the systems rsc -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |