From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: About cachetype on ARMv7
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 15:17:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100705141719.GA23556@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <004c01cb1c34$49773f60$dc65be20$%kim@samsung.com>
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 08:21:56PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> If every ARMv7 SoCs have VIPT non-aliasing d-cache and i-cache, then no
> problem. But actually, Samsung S5PV310(cortex-A9) has PIPT d-cache and VIPT
> non-aliasing i-cache. I think PIPT does not mean VIPT non-aliasing even
> though their functionality is similar.
There is no visible difference between a non-aliasing VIPT cache and a
PIPT cache. Address bit allocation for a 32-byte cache line VIPT
non-aliasing cache with 4K page size:
[0:1] = byte offset into word
[4:2] = word offset
[N-1:5] = virtual index
[31:N] = physical tag
where N <= PAGE_SHIFT, otherwise it would be an aliasing VIPT cache.
For a PIPT non-aliasing cache:
[0:1] = byte offset into word
[4:2] = word offset
[M-1:5] = physical index
[31:M] = physical tag
where M doesn't matter as it can never alias with itself.
The requirements for N is such the CPU visible conditions which qualify a
cache as being VIPT non-aliasing also satisfy PIPT - and a non-aliasing
VIPT cache has the same properties as a PIPT cache.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-05 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-05 11:21 About cachetype on ARMv7 Kukjin Kim
2010-07-05 14:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-07-07 0:20 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-07-07 7:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-08 0:52 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-07-08 8:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-08 10:18 ` Kukjin Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100705141719.GA23556@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).