From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:28:48 +0100 Subject: [RFC,PATCH 0/2] Allow late mdesc detection In-Reply-To: References: <1278903792.387175.713057245098.0.gpush@pororo> <1278921935.9235.90.camel@pororo.lan> Message-ID: <20100713072848.GC19839@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 01:44:59PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote: > With the introduction of 'struct machine_class', I guess this is especially > true for 1 SoC for one DT machine ID :-) > > Finally, if we can decide the 'struct machine_class' by something else, > then we can merge all DT machine IDs into one or completely ignore it. As far as I can see, DT isn't getting anywhere - certainly my request to see it on a real platform rather than the ARM Ltd hardware seems to have been "forgotten" about. As it's taking soo long (it's getting to be a couple of years) to come up with a DT implementation for a real machine, I can only think that there must be some massive problem(s) with DT which makes it completely unsuitable for use on ARM.