From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:49:43 +0100 Subject: About SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem In-Reply-To: References: <000601cb219c$c7830b60$56892220$%kim@samsung.com> <001b01cb21aa$ef0e4d80$cd2ae880$%kim@samsung.com> <20100713092658.GB29885@csn.ul.ie> <20100713093815.GD20590@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100713095035.GE29885@csn.ul.ie> <20100713173744.GB30142@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100713203250.GA21600@csn.ul.ie> Message-ID: <20100714084943.GA9115@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:59:06AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > But I think Kukjin case's best solution is to make section size 16M, not 256M. > Regardless of this, Your idea is the direction we should proceed, I think. So what if someone decides to fit 8MB DRAMs to the board?