From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: ARM Machine SoC I/O setup and PAD initialization code
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:20:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100722072034.GA6802@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100722023250.GC27663@verge.net.au>
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:32:53AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> Would it be feasible to use Linux + kexec as the boot loader as
> a long term solution to fixing boot loaders by eliminating them?
So what you're proposing is that a broken boot loader should boot a
version of Linux to fix the pin MUX, which then kexecs a kernel which
doesn't have that code?
What's the point of that - when the first kernel will be able to run
the system?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-22 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-21 8:29 ARM Machine SoC I/O setup and PAD initialization code David Jander
2010-07-21 8:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-22 2:32 ` Simon Horman
2010-07-22 7:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-07-22 7:29 ` Simon Horman
2010-07-22 8:38 ` Magnus Damm
2010-07-22 8:49 ` Eric Miao
2010-07-22 9:01 ` Magnus Damm
2010-07-22 9:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-22 8:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-22 9:14 ` Simon Horman
2010-07-24 21:36 ` Grant Likely
2010-07-22 8:16 ` Magnus Damm
2010-07-22 12:10 ` David Jander
2010-07-22 12:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-22 12:56 ` Mark Brown
2010-07-22 13:31 ` David Jander
2010-07-22 13:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-23 10:35 ` David Jander
2010-07-23 13:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-22 14:20 ` Mark Brown
2010-07-23 10:18 ` David Jander
2010-07-23 12:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-23 14:17 ` Mark Brown
2010-07-23 18:38 ` david at protonic.nl
2010-07-23 19:59 ` Jason McMullan
2010-07-23 21:03 ` Robert Schwebel
2010-07-26 1:37 ` Magnus Damm
2010-07-26 6:56 ` Robert Schwebel
2010-07-24 18:50 ` Mark Brown
2010-07-22 15:00 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-07-23 10:31 ` David Jander
2010-07-22 13:41 ` Rob Herring
2010-07-22 21:20 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100722072034.GA6802@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).