From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:45:40 +0100 Subject: Git pull request: ARM LPC32XX architecture In-Reply-To: <083DF309106F364B939360100EC290F80AC392A1F8@eu1rdcrdc1wx030.exi.nxp.com> References: <20100312210353.GB1146@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <083DF309106F364B939360100EC290F80AC2FF1AE8@eu1rdcrdc1wx030.exi.nxp.com> <20100525172106.GA16204@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <083DF309106F364B939360100EC290F80AC2FF21ED@eu1rdcrdc1wx030.exi.nxp.com> <083DF309106F364B939360100EC290F80AC392A1F8@eu1rdcrdc1wx030.exi.nxp.com> Message-ID: <20100727164540.GC17099@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 06:19:36PM +0200, Kevin Wells wrote: > I just wanted to drop a friendly reminder on this pull request. As > of yesterday, everything still built fine with the latest tree, but > it's in need of some updates. Can you still pull this and I'll apply > the updates in another patch series in the next week? Yes, with one change - the defconfig needs attention. Uwe has a tool which can be used to compress it. Even so, I don't think we want, at this stage, to antagonise Linus by adding a new defconfig - we already have more than too many.