linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] sdhci-s3c: add regulator support
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:39:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100728173954.GD22544@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1280326797-15792-5-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 04:19:57PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:

>  static int sdhci_s3c_suspend(struct platform_device *dev, pm_message_t pm)
>  {
> +	int ret = 0;
>  	struct sdhci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct sdhci_s3c *sc = sdhci_priv(host);
>  
>  	sdhci_suspend_host(host, pm);
> -	return 0;
> +
> +	if (sc->vmmc)
> +		ret = regulator_disable(sc->vmmc);
> +

So, on suspend you disable the regulator...

> +	struct sdhci_s3c *sc = sdhci_priv(host);
> +
> +	if (sc->vmmc) {
> +		int ret = regulator_disable(sc->vmmc);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;

...and on resume you disable it again.  I'm surprised this works
properly after resume, at the very least the core is going to get
confused about the reference counts I'd expect.

I suspect this is for something we need to do better in the regulator
API - restoring the state of the regulators after a resume if the
hardware changes them.  A lot of regulators just do this in hardware so
we didn't need to worry about it previously.

> +		mdelay(2);

This could do with some sort of comment.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-07-28 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-28 14:19 [PATCH] SDHCI-S3C updates Marek Szyprowski
2010-07-28 14:19 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] sdhci-s3c: add support for the non standard minimal clock value Marek Szyprowski
2010-07-28 16:48   ` Ben Dooks
2010-07-29  5:30     ` Marek Szyprowski
2010-07-28 14:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] sdhci-s3c: enable SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_HISPD_BIT quirk Marek Szyprowski
2010-07-28 14:19 ` [PATCHv5 3/4] sdhci-s3c: add support for new card detection methods (driver part) Marek Szyprowski
2010-07-28 14:39   ` Maurus Cuelenaere
2010-07-29  5:22     ` Marek Szyprowski
2010-07-28 17:03   ` Ben Dooks
2010-07-29  5:40     ` Marek Szyprowski
2010-07-28 14:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] sdhci-s3c: add regulator support Marek Szyprowski
2010-07-28 14:48   ` Maurus Cuelenaere
2010-07-28 15:41     ` Mark Brown
2010-07-28 17:06       ` Maurus Cuelenaere
2010-07-28 17:14         ` Mark Brown
2010-07-29  5:28     ` Marek Szyprowski
2010-07-28 17:39   ` Mark Brown [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100728173954.GD22544@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).